How does a piece like this get published on the Washington Post? And how can a plagiariser like Fareed Zakaria continue to make a living by writing BS like this? This piece has no coherent argument whatsoever. First, he makes the not-so-evident statement that Islamic extremism was the result of secular Arab dictators not banning religion. Then, he suggests that we could see the rise of an Islamic State in Egypt as a result of the banning and persecution of the Muslim Brotherhood. What kind of logic can reconcile both of these statements?
Posted on: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:15:16 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015