How long have known about Peevski? If you take a step back and remember what happened from May 28 onwards, we find that story Peevski can be predicted. Because if it was not the promised post on SANS BSP would not have to have surgery. Comment by Tatiana Waksberg: Before leaving the policy Stanishev has to answer one question: who is behind his decisions? Poluizrazenata opposition Socialist Party can not let him leave without giving him this answer. A can and she can do it only as an observer and not a participant in the whole process. The reason to ask this question at least two and are rooted in the only two certainties in history: how it became technically possible Peevski to head the National Security Agency and how it was explained to the political socialists. The new face of SANS First, changes in the law for SANS are proposed to be passed before the cabinet Oresharsky, not after. These changes were made by four people, including Sergey Stanishev and Lutfi places. One of the amendments provides new requirements for candidates for the Director of National Security Agency. Without this amendment Peevski could never lead the service because there was no requirement by law experience - neither in duration nor professional profile. Who manages whom? And who ruled Bulgaria? The question that arises from this fact is the following: how these changes were explained to the members of the BSP? How party leader Stanishev has argued that its proposal for amendment affecting requirements of SANS boss? Amendments are simply inexplicable to the times in which it was imported. Stanishev and places them predgalat on May 28, when the country has no government and forces stalemate in parliament are allocated. Neither the program nor the vocal intentions of DPS and BSP case that will change the face of SANS. Let alone that will make it a priority. And the blatant message is that the changes are written for a specific person. According to the new Article 8, the future director now has only eight years of service, not 10, you do not need and have completed internship in security services, available is sufficient only legal experience (as a formal Peevski). And another thing: The amendments made by the two party leaders, the future director of the National Security Agency can not be removed from office if they commit a "serious infringement or systematic neglect of their duties." He can not be fired and if it makes "acts undermining the prestige of the agency." The big "surprise" 17 days later, members of the Socialist Party said they called them without explanation early morning meeting at which Stanishev surprise them with its proposal Peevski to head the National Security Agency. Let us imagine that telling the truth. Let them believe that they were surprised. But how will you explain that earlier voted these changes to the law? What motivated them to download both the basic requirements for an internship? And who were they thinking when they decided to allow the future director of SANS to "tarnishes the image of the agency" and "committed a serious violation"? There is a second reason to ask Stanishev who actually run it, and hence the country. This reason stems from the way Stanishev has argued lawmakers Peevski your choosing. He told them that some thugs organized by Borisov and Tsvetanov, gathered in Vratsa and cooked conspiracy against the Socialists. In other words, there is a threat that needs to be answered properly. Amendments to the National Security Agency were written as if specially for Peevski Interesting here is how Stanishev could have such information. If the services, it is unclear why they follow other parliamentarians in the face of Borisov and Tsvetanov (which at that time was still immune). It is not clear what prevents staff to act against these "conspirators" after they failed to reach their plans without the help of capacity Peevski. Furthermore Stanishev should have learned of "conspiracy" no later than May 26 - at least two days prior to the revision of the Law on National Security Agency, created in measure Peevski. Outcome This coincides with the days that were expected proposals for ministers by Oresharsky. These proposals are expected in the hope of many people - not only because of institutional and cultural exhaustion caused by GERD, but also because of the sudden confidence with which DPS and BSP had talked to one of their future study. June 14 morning Stanishev told his MPs that if Peevski not lead SANS, the government will fall. Is sounded like he said, we are threatened by thugs, so only thug can fight them off and save us study. Only it probably meant something true: we would not get our government if we had promised the post of Peevski. In this sense, if not Peevski head SANS DPS bring down the cabinet. Author: T. Waksberg, Editor: D. Popova-Vittsel
Posted on: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:01:10 +0000