I appreciate that the Washington Post provided this to explain the - TopicsExpress



          

I appreciate that the Washington Post provided this to explain the events, including the conflicting testimonies from the witnesses. I was wondering if anyone has insight as to whether or not there are important details missing from this account. For example, I saw no mention of Brown reaching for Wilsons gun. And if this is the way the events were laid out before the grand jury, how could they make the decision they came to? I just want to attempt to make sense of this.
Posted on: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:06:41 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015