I don’t believe in Hell, but if I did it would be a mandatory online social network where no one can over simplify anything, make assumptions, use ad hominems, rhetoric, memes, or go pee. LOL If I wanted to subject myself to something that mind numbingly boring, I’d read peer reviewed journals (I actually do read them if I’m completely honest). Just about everything everyone says on Facebook is filled with all those things because people don’t have time to give a detailed elaborations every time they want to make a point and no one has the time to read them either and thank goodness they don’t. Face book is not a good reference page; the most you can rationally justify on a social network is pointing out the question. Any explanation beyond that should be gotten from a more creditable website, because no matter what you write, at the end of the day it’s just another source on the internet, I don’t want Facebook or me to be used as a source, if they’re interested in the question they should go to credible web pages like I do, not social networks, the idea of people using Facebook as a source makes me cringe more than them using Wikipedia, which only bothers if people don’t double check Wikipedia’s sources.
Posted on: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 06:16:57 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015