I don’t care what message is attached to this picture. I want you to look at this building and tell me why debris was flung hundreds of feet out and it’s falling into itself (the path of most resistance). But as you can see its fountain like destruction doesn’t appear to be gravitational. We’re told that the top is collapsing but the lower floors are intact creating resistance and the pressure of the above floors are making the air and debris blow outward. Perfect! So if there’s this great resistance below then how did it fall at near freefall speed which would indicate very little resistance? Fire fighters not only said they heard explosions “as if they had plans to take down the building,” but numerous fire fighters and others witnessed molten metal afterwards. I’ve never heard how temperatures required to produce molten metal could occur. NIST never tested for “exotic accelerants” (would explain molten) even though by law they have to because the evidence was overwhelming. You won’t find what you’re not looking for and NIST had to change their verbiage at least 3 times because real scientists called them out (in addition to them admitting partial free fall). The kicker is that we spent 4 times more money investigating the Clinton-Lewinski affair than we did investigating 9/11, the largest terror attack on American soil. As usual: nothing to see here…hey look, Miley is getting naked again!
Posted on: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:07:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015