I know the subjects worn out, but after watching that Tony Stewart - TopicsExpress



          

I know the subjects worn out, but after watching that Tony Stewart video 50 plus times (more trying to play detective than being morbidly entertained) I cant deny what I saw.. Too many blind apologists for Stewart on FB today.. You can say whatever you want about the kid getting too close to the action, I agree with that.. but dont tell me Tony Stewart wasnt carrying out a reactive and intentional act of aggression.. 1.) he knew there was a caution, he caused the damn caution (whether intentional or not), and even if he didnt somebody came over his radio within that lap to inform him of the caution.. 2.) watch the video, not only can you see his acceleration plain as day, you can hear it.. He didnt fishtail b/c he was braking, he fishtailed b/c of the amount of torque being applied (from acceleration) on vehicle with a light frame and back end .. 3. I dont think Stewart tried to kill him by any means.. I do think he tried to buzz him (just like Maverick buzzed the Air Traffic Control Tower on Top Gun) and that it was an intentional aggressive bluff that went horribly wrong.. Bottom-line is both parties reckless behavior contributed to the end result, a 20 yr old kid losing his life... The difference is Stewart is 43, more than twice Wards age and has a very well documented history of anger management issues... Ward made a huge mistake and it cost him his life, but he was a 20 yr old kid.. when the lights go off at night and Stewarts lying in bed, hes gotta live with that..
Posted on: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:07:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015