I looked up quickly the last game and can say that I do not know where did Anand do mistake, maybe even all endgame is better for white I do not know, black has better pawn structure but is somewhat passive on the kingside and white has a pari of bishops. They repeated the moves so Anand was happy to draw this game at any moment but then somehow Blacks pawn on a3 was lost and White transfered to a won opposite coloured Bishops game with 2 extra pawns for White. So I really do not know why did black lose, maybe it is wrong to take with d-pawn on c6 and allow this endgame but I am not so sure because before that game Black was taking with d-pawn and not b-pawn. I still do not believe that Whites Queen to d3 is so strong. So again Carlsen is a mistery to me, he wins again in some slightly better endgame but I do not understand why did he win at all! In short he does not play some highly theoretical lines but he plays simple peasant like computer chess without great deep strategy but very effective and the rate of his mistakes is next to 0, in short he plays like computer and I hate this dry stile but as we can see now in practice that boring computer like style pays off. Still for me Ficher is a genius and Carlsen is not, undersigned by B-Unit!
Posted on: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:18:13 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015