I was being told that a lot of our country RICH TYCOON is sponsoring both side ( BN and PR ) during GE 13. One of the main reason is because they still want to protect their business interest. They really thought that PR do stand a chance to be the next government. Sometimes I seriously do not understand the RICH TYCOON for making such a decision. If it is true by reality ( not perception ) PR really do have the chance to win then I truly agree of your betting ( 50% 50% ) in Business point of view. They are a Business Genius ( investment , stock market , analysis and etc ) but they are not politically wise. Come back to simple mathematics ( I already said this many times even way before GE 13 ). How can the 26% of the consumer ( in business term ) can ever beat the 60% ? Plus with this time half of the another bottom 15% of the consumer is already with BN ? Even half of 60% + 7.5% = 37.5% which is even way much more than the 26%. Second calculation will be the rural market is way higher and larger than the urban market and product like GSC and TGV ( example of PR in politics ) still hardly making any progress in the rural area. By math again we already know who is having the power of more constituency way before GE 13. You guys read the GE 13 prediction based on think tank , political research , and politicians statement ? Hello ! You guys are master of businessman ( politician ) and you guys knew so well as a businessman that most of the stock market news and analysis out there are not the accurate 1. Those are just BRANDING and PERCEPTION that do not reflect the reality of the stock market , investments and business. You guys are the mastermind to sell news and perception to what you want YOUR CONSUMER TO BUY IT . This is exactly how all the politician operates . And end up as a great Business genius you yourself failing into trap as a consumer. Most importantly , even by analyzing PR stats you knew that non of PR research ever claim that they can win more than 120 seats. So even if they win it will be an extremely narrow win and in politics anything can happen with such a super slim majority that end up the result may turn up to be the otherwise. ( rmb Perak ? ). This is politics. On the other hand , out of the 26% of the 2nd largest consumer that both BN and PR reports that they are with opposition nobody ever predicted it will be below 20%. Not a single politicians , think tanks and political research or reports from both side even claimed that it will be below 20%. But both side agree the top 60% and the bottom 15% now have swing back to BN. By math how PR can win ? You think by playing a 50% 50% investment u will end up gaining both ? In business and investment theory yes but in political reality it is an extremely great blunder. You think u r gambling rolex ? ( 50% 50% ) ? In reality , you r gambling a game of poker ( all in - either gain it all or lose it all ). This round u guys are lucky to be having a forgiving BN and PM. But that is the versatility of politics. Different humans got the nature and human is hard to predict. If I am the 1 being up there even u play a 50% 50% I will make sure you end up having 0% if I eventually became the winner. In my life there is no 50% 50%. My life is always A GAME OF POKER. ALL IN. EITHER 100% or 0%. Win or Lose. Nothing in between. Forget about politics. come back to investment theory. You invested 50% 50% and hope to gain back 50% for no matter what outcome. But do u think of this investment consequences ? 1. You became rich because of BN. You invested in PR. Before they win they will be nice towards you. Once they win u think they will still let you enjoy your fortune rather than bringing up their own TYCOON ? China 5000 years war of history had proven again and again once the former EMPEROR is being brought down all his entire people will die with him and the new emperor will come in with his new team. But before the upcoming emperor can become the emperor they will continue use you for their personal benefit ( and letting u guys think that u r using them for a 50% investment ). 2. Now BN won and know about it. If u have certain personality like me then end up your investment although is 50% but end up will be having a return of 0% or maybe worst than that. But if u r having a forgiving individual and entity that you end up getting back 50% as u had invested. Is this a healthy investment ? Invest 50% and gain back 50% ( end up equal to 0% ). 3. Even from no 1 reason already tell u that u do not have much choice. You should instead invest 60% 0% and gain back 100% ( earning back 40% ).
Posted on: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:01:04 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015