I was sentenced by the court of South Korea ordered the individual compensation to the original recruitment Kou wartime Japanese companies such as Nippon Steel Sumitomo Metals. For compensation problem of recruitment of Engineering, but in spite of the match in the standpoint of been resolved and "full" and "final" of 1965 in the "Japan-Korea claims agreement" in both Japan and South Korea both governments. There are other examples of judicial Korea, who defeated the decision outrageous. County designated tangible cultural property stolen from Kwan Yin in Nagasaki Prefecture Tsushima such as "Kanzeonbosatsu seated figure" while being discovered in Korea, it has not been returned to Japan still. South Korea and pumice stone temple that the alleged owner of the original complaint "Bodhisattva seated figure is something that has been looting by Japanese pirates" or, March the Daejeon District Court, that "Kwan has acquired legitimately Buddha until proven , I because he ruled the South Korean government and "should not be returned to the Japanese side. Horiuchi Y. lawyer alarmed to justice in South Korea speak this way. Can not say what it amazed ". The courts of Japan make a decision like this there can be no absolutely. It is specified right" occupant to exercise with respect to Possessed thing and "is presumed to legitimately in the Civil Code have. means that people who claim that it is not the property of that person, must prove that effect. That Buseoksa temple side must be demonstrated that "Kwan has acquired unfairly Buddha" The Korean government should not have returned to Japan that Kwan has obtained legitimately Buddha until proven "rather than is "in. Is located in the loose rock temple side burden of proof. Legal system of Korea is constructed as a role model to Japan, even though there is no significant difference in legal theory, Why judicial decisions that ignore the principles of law such as this is what comes out, I suffer from understanding " Bullshit the first time in Korean judiciary is cracked table also incident delivery denial of Yasukuni arsonist of January. I set fire to the shrine There is doubt, the Japanese side were asked to deliver based on the "extradition treaty", the custody of Chinese suspects have been detained in Korea, Seoul High Court and political prisoners which the Convention is outside the scope of repatriation he was certified. The High Court that "war criminals are enshrined in Yasukuni Shrine, relevant to the political purpose is there in the arson suspect" or, but the Chinese government is that it has pushed for repatriation to China, the yuan in Korea that had put pressure on the South Korean government to such anti-Japanese organizations to support the comfort women is not handed over to Japan. If justice has succumbed to the request of such anti-Japanese forces in China and South Korea is a rogue state anymore. ※ 10 Mon SAPIO2013 year Source NEWS Post Seven 2013.09.23 news-postseven/
Posted on: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:23:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015