IF THE WORLD OF SCIENCE - THE BEST SCIENTISTS ARE USING YOUR - TopicsExpress



          

IF THE WORLD OF SCIENCE - THE BEST SCIENTISTS ARE USING YOUR WORK.... :-) I AM SO SURPRISED & I FEEL VERY HONORED!!! :-D By the way... I wrote about ART & POLITICS.... if someone is interested.... othes.univie.ac.at/26966/ but I am sorry.... only in German :-) innovation-entrepreneurship/content/pdf/s13731-014-0012-2.pdf ... Endnotes aConcepts and terms in reference to knowledge production and innovation will be explained in greater detail later in this article. bFor example, see on Google Scholar the tracking of references to the concept of the Quadruple Helix innovations systems: scholar.google.at/scholar? cites=2775322365902273481&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en. cWithin the context of our analysis, the plural term ‘sciences’ always includes the natural sciences, life sciences, and also the social sciences and humanities (human sciences). For us, the sciences address the whole and complete disciplinary spectrum. Therefore, ‘sciences’ is not equivalent to science. When we use the shorter expression ‘scientific research’, we actually always mean the research in all of the sciences. dOf course, depending on how the sciences or knowledge production in the sciences is defined or is being defined, we may arrive here at different conclusions. Perhaps, the sciences (or pre-forms of the sciences) are just as old as the arts (pre-forms of arts). Reasoning and aesthetic sensitivity represent universal categories of humanity. eIn her Master thesis, Derya Öcal also reflects on the question, What is Art? Was ist Kunst? fWe would like to add that art also reflects culture and the experiences on which culture is being based or which influence culture. This is also being expressed and recognized in the following: The Knowledge of Culture and the Culture of Knowledge (Carayannis and Pirzadeh 2014). gPerhaps it would be fairer to talk here about the ‘beauties’ or ‘non-beauties’ always in the plural form (in contrast to a ‘singular’ beauty or non-beauty). Depending on the specific context (time, era or society), the understanding of the beautiful often varied or varies. Also, within a specific context, quite different understandings of the beautiful can co-exist (partly in contradiction to each other). In that sense, beauty obviously depends upon culture. hIn the context of our analysis here, we use knowledge production and knowledge creation as interchangeable concepts. We could speculate whether ‘knowledge creation’ fits better for purposes of describing processes (knowledge-based processes) in the arts and in artistic research than the term ‘knowledge production’.
Posted on: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:43:38 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015