//Ian Adams Admin, thank you for showing how well preserved the Bible is. Even when a probable error or interpolation occurs, we can identify it and point it out as probably not suppose to be there or even as someones own notes in his personal copy. Now let us see you do the same with this.// yeah,gud... you can identify it today,when people found some old manuscript in last couple of hundred years before..what about those who who lived before this ? in late 15th century nt was divided in chapters and verses....there was no problem during these times... but when siniticus,vaticus were found in 18th century,then general followers came to know about the differences,when these manuscript were printed or translated. Why didn;t this was found from the start ? //probable error or interpolation occurs// you think i will not chk these points before posting claim....? its just that you dont want to accept truth my friend... //During the time of the prophet, the chapter of the Parties used to be two hundred verses when read. When Uthman edited the copies of the Qur’an, only the current (verses) were recorded (73 verses).(Suyuti: Itqan, part 3, page 72).// a....man...you cant even copy correct references from anti-islamic sites ? the page no part 3 have another saying than the one you posted is WRONG. its copy error done by you . ;) Who cares what a 14th century person says ? anyone can say anything. S.A enjoy these notes https://facebook/notes/answering-christanity/surah-1113114-not-in-mushaf-of-masud-collection-/342854339080142 https://facebook/notes/answering-christanity/quranic-verses-eaten-by-a-goat-explained/203775376321373
Posted on: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:04:14 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015