If this mission was so dangerous it had to authorize out of - TopicsExpress



          

If this mission was so dangerous it had to authorize out of theater, then why was an outdated CH-47 helicopter, a vehicle better used for hurricane relief, sent into an active battle? Who made the call? Who decided to send a ’copter full of America’s most precious asset with no gunship escort, no pre-assault fire, no drone and no “eye in the sky”? Why were so many special ops being transported all together in a single aircraft? Why were the elite special ops flying with Afghan personnel? What was the chain of command? Why were seven Afghan commandos pulled and seven substituted at the last second without changing the manifest? Why were the bodies immediately cremated without permission from the families? Why is the black box missing? Why are the Afghan National Army, the Afghan National Police and the Afghan Security Ministry involved in the planning and execution of every U.S. combat operation? Was the flight plan leaked to the Taliban? Did Karzai cut a deal with the Taliban, or was there an even more sinister quid pro quo? Did Obama’s “Rules of Engagement” prevent our military from returning fire even though they were under attack? Why is our president afraid to name the enemy? Is the “heart and mind of the enemy” more valuable than the life of a single United States soldier?
Posted on: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:25:35 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015