Ill pass along an observation from a friend: Then the writer tells you what youre supposed to be seeing. Swallow that and then NOTE the following discrepancies: > This video is not date/time stamped > The video is taken on the 5th floor when the incident occurred on the first > The bldg. was not officially open (reportedly just before 8 AM), therefore a security check point with officer would not have been in place to enter the Chambers Briefing Room at the time of the incident > The elevator on the 5th floor opens from the opposite side (west side) that Atkins is shown entering from. He is actually entering from the offices opposite the CC offices. Hes walking south which correctly places the entrance to the CC Chambers on the right side from the camera angle as portrayed. My conclusion is that this does not represent what is stated, is trumped up, appears to be a CYA act by the city, and is false as connected to the reported incident. How does this help the confusion factor ???
Posted on: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:56:12 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015