In fact, even evolutionists have contemplated the implications, as illustrated in the quote below from Jack Horners recent book. The setting for this excerpt is a conversation between Dr. Horner and Mary Schweitzer when she was his graduate student. Schweitzer had just discovered and verified the presence of intact dinosaur tissue and was relaying the news to her mentor. When Mary was first working on this material, she called me up to say she had found osteocytes. I assumed she meant the spaces where the osteocytes would have been, which is what I suggested. No, Jack, actually we have the cells and they have filipodia and they have nuclei. Mary, the freaking creationists are just going to love you. Jack, its your dinosaur. That about sums it up. Derrick Briggs, curator of invertebrate paleontology at the Peabody Museum at Yale University agrees saying, Nobody was imagining that dinosaurs might have had preserved soft tissues… this was totally improbable….We have this clear understanding that part of all biological cycles involves decay. Natures set up to break down that material and recycle it. So, it’s just improbable that those kinds of very delicate structures would survive, particularly for millions of years. youtube/watch?v=kXfKCnDCf50 He’s also agreeing that nothing we can verify with science would allow soft tissue to last for millions of years. Unfortunately, none of these evolutionists are considering that the millions of years dates for the dino fossils could be wrong. That concept is one which is not allowed to be wrong no matter how much evidence comes against it. Everything else can be wrong, including everything we know about science...but evolution and its claims cant possibly be wrong.
Posted on: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:31:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015