In the Oswald Innocence Campaign, we are not just studying history; we are making history. Historically, we are the ONLY organization in the world that has ever been formed to champion the innocence of Lee Harvey Oswald. There are other organizations which dispute the official story of the JFK assassination, but that is not the same thing. We insist that OSWALD WAS INNOCENT! Thats what we say, and thats what we are about. And to those who say there are better ways to prove Oswalds innocence than to say that he was in the doorway, I say: you are wrong. In any criminal trial, the defense of a wrongly accused person comes down to one thing: proving that he or she was somewhere else at the time the crime was committed. Its called an ALIBI. To win, you have to have an alibi. Oswald has to have an alibi. And Oswald does have an alibi! He was standing in the doorway at the time of the murder. He told Will Fritz he was out with Bill Shelley in front. If you tell us not to use it, youre telling us not to use the most powerful thing that can exonerate him. Like every other defendant, Oswald needs his alibi. The absurdity of the Single Bullet Theory cant save him. That only establishes that there were multiple shooters, but Oswald could have been one of them. Isnt that what the HSCA finally settled on? Did it help Oswald? No. Not in the least. Where was Oswald during the murder if he was not in the doorway? Oswald was not in the lunch room at 12:30, and there is no basis to say that. He had already eaten lunch, and there is no doubt about that. And his Coke-drinking didnt come until after his encounter with Truly and Baker, and there is no doubt about that either. So, why oh why would Oswald prefer to sit in the dank lunch room alone at 12:30 doing nothing except stare at the walls when he could be outside in the sunlight watching President John Kennedy ride by? The Man in the Doorway does look like Oswald, and he is dressed like Oswald, exactly like Oswald. So, what is the problem about recognizing him as Oswald? So, we make that the centerpiece of the OIC, but its only because a credible alibi is the centerpiece of EVERY defendants defense. But, we are interested in all aspects of the JFK assassination. We want to exonerate him for the murder of Tippit as much as we do the murder of Kennedy. Likewise, we want to exonerate him for the attempted shooting of General Walker. Oswald never did that. And lets be thorough: Oswald is also accused of having sought to kill Richard Nixon in April 1963, and according to officialdom, the only reason it didnt happen is because Marina locked him in the bathroom. Its complete nonsense. Nixon wasnt even in Dallas at the time. So, we are into all aspects of the JFK assassination, but we know that there is no defending Oswald without providing him an alibi. We are approaching this as though we are Oswalds lawyers. And we do have two very prominent lawyers in our group: Mark Lane and Vincent Salandria. And as Oswalds lawyers, we know that our case rests on establishing that it was IMPOSSIBLE for Oswald to have done it because he was SOMEWHERE ELSE at the time, a place that can be pinpointed and proven. So, when it comes to defending Lee Harvey Oswald, we are doing it the only way it can be done- the way it has to be done. And anyone who truly wants to help him will realize that we are right about this, and we are the only real defenders that hes got. And theyll join us. oswald-innocent
Posted on: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:12:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015