In this Appellate Court Proceeding your can find Dr. Tony Bennett, Travis Haire, the currently indicted Teresa Perkins and others. Bennett, Haire, Sipes and some other simply removed the job title position, thus rendering my wonderful ethical, highly respected and proficient boss, Qudisa Davis jobless. Bennett, Haire and I believe at the bottom of page 2 Teresa Perkins is mentioned right along with Dr. Tony Bennett. I just noticed this today. IS THIS THE SAME, NOW INDICTED GCCS SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER TERESA PERKINS? I only posted two pages to notate the people at the bottom of page 2. Same old white collar criminals going from New Albany to Clark County. Amazing. If u want to read the entire affidavit the link is pasted below. The web link is in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/02280701ehf.pdf Title: Qudsia Davis vs. New Albany-Floyd County Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: MATTHEW JON McGOVERN THOMAS J. BELCHER Evansville, Indiana SHANNON L. ROBINSON Kelley Belcher & Brown Bloomington, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA QUDSIA DAVIS, ) ) Appellant-Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 22A01-0606-CV-231 ) NEW ALBANY-FLOYD COUNTY ) CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORP.; TRAVIS ) HAIRE; STEVE SIPES; and THE BOARD ) OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF NEW ALBANY-) FLOYD COUNTY CONSOLIDATED ) SCHOOL CORP., ) ) Appellees-Defendants. ) APPEAL FROM THE FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Michael A. Robbins, Judge Cause No. 22C01-0312-CT-640 February 28, 2007 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION FRIEDLANDER, Judge Qudsia Davis filed a complaint against the New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation (the School Corporation), Travis Haire, Stephen Sipes, and The Board of School Trustees of New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation (the Board) (collectively, the defendants) alleging retaliatory discharge, tortious interference, breach of contract, fraud, and defamation.1 The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Davis appeals, raising the following consolidated and restated issue for review: Did the trial court err by entering summary judgment? We affirm. Viewed in a light most favorable to Davis, the nonmovant, the facts are as follows. On August 31, 2000, Davis and the School Corporation executed an employment contract (the first contract) pursuant to which Davis was employed as the Director (the director) of the Department of Student Services (the department). Among her duties, Davis served as an expulsion examiner for the School Corporation.2 According to the terms of the first 1 Davis also named Dennis Cahill, Tony Bennett, Teresa Perkins, W. Douglas Meredith, Barbara Lamb, Carl Christenson, Jane MacGregor, and Ernest Smith as defendants, but the complaint against each was dismissed. 2
Posted on: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:09:11 +0000