Initially, we hear that a white cop shot a black, unarmed, freshly - TopicsExpress



          

Initially, we hear that a white cop shot a black, unarmed, freshly minted high school graduate. The pretense was something like jaywalking, but of course the real impetus was irrational racial prejudice. The cop was white, the victim was black. What more do you need to know? In response, a feral gang of youths (or teens, or whatever--insert the euphemism of your choice here) violently began looting and destroying local businesses. And if not naturally, they did so at least understandably--that is, after all, what civilized people do when they feel aggrieved. They smash stuff! Those who focused on the mob violence were accused of missing the real story, the lack of social justice, preferring instead to allow their own lying eyes to maintain the vicious stereotypes theyd constructed and maintained in their own minds. The sorts of heuristics that tell them blacks are nearly ten times as likely to commit violent crimes as whites are. That these facts are, well, facts, isnt important. What is important is that they are Racist and therefore should be dismissed out of hand. Still dusting off from the pounding they took from the truth in the Trayvon Martin case, the major media recklessly descended upon the inner St. Louis suburb no one in their ranks had ever heard of a month ago and got to work transmitting the official Narrative to the nation. That narrative started to fall apart immediately. Against the wishes of the US Justice Department, local sources managed to get a hold of convenience store footage showing Michael Brown filching from and then bullying an ethnic store clerk. Its unfortunate the public was able to view the footage, but we should still be grateful that our government is doing all it can to protect our right not to know. Character assassination! came the cries of professional race hustlers and shakedown artists, as though content of character is irrelevant in evaluating an event in which eyewitness accounts differ as to what exactly transpired. It clearly wasnt irrelevant to the mob of looters who errantly targeted an uninvolved QuikTrip under the faulty presumption that it was the store that had reported Browns cigar theft. The cop didnt know Brown was suspected of stealing! That may be utter bullshit on its face, as the cop, Darren Wilson, allegedly put two and two together after seeing Brown and his friend walking in the middle of the road with what appeared to be cigars. But even if Wilson was unaware for the duration of the encounter, Brown knew what he had done and acted accordingly in his confrontation with Wilson. A bloodied face and fractured eye socket exposed more mendacity in the official Narrative. Brown physically assaulted Wilson. During the assault, it looks as though Wilsons gun discharged. As pillar after pillar of the Narrative crumbles, the Establishment is now taking refuge in the assertion that Brown was fleeing the scene when he was fatally shot. Attorney General Eric Holder ordered a third autopsy performed after the first two didnt return the results he desired (this one putting little emphasis on the THC levels in Browns body at the time he was killed; marijuana is, after all, benevolent and has no affect whatsoever on inhibition or the lack thereof!). This is the same sage who bullied Missouri state officials into calling off National Guard troops, resulting in a couple more days of unchecked violence and looting in Ferguson before St. Louis county took charge of the situation. A real class act, that Holder. The Ferguson police department says it has over a dozen witnesses who claim Brown was charging Wilson when he was given the coup de grace, and there is allegedly as of yet unreleased footage from dashboard and body cameras that will add more clarity to what happened in the final moments of Browns life. Even if the Establishment finally gets some good news (ie, Wilson acted out of line, justice wasnt served, and an abuse of police power occurred) on this last account, it makes for a pretty pathetic illustration of what Steve Sailer describes as putatively being one of the Defining Events of Our Time, a Searing Indictment of the National Crisis of the White Racist Power Structure Murdering Black Babies. Rather, its just another local police blotter item of crazy ass behavior in the ‘hood? I don’t care what race you are, if you are in a dispute with a cop and thrust your head into his police car and then his gun goes off hurting and no do doubt scaring him, it’s highly likely additional bad things are going to happen. In a country of 320 million people, this is the story the Establishment chooses to spotlight in its ongoing effort to spin a story diametrically at odds with the empirical realities on the ground? Again, Steve Sailer: [The Establishment] needs Incidents, ideally involving white men murdering innocent blacks. But, that just doesn’t happen much, our entire system is obsessed with punishing it when it does happen, and the Obamas and Holders and the press are dependent upon potential examples being brought forward to their attention by mobs exacting pogroms upon convenience stores for snitching. And mobs are notably bad at careful evaluation of the evidence. The desperation to impugn middle class white America would almost be funny if it werent so dangerous. Twenty years ago, Ferguson was predominantly white. Then Section 8 housing was imposed on the southeast side of the city. Predictably crime, poverty, illegitimacy, and uncivic behavior all increased. Whites began fleeing, and now the place is in the process of becoming unlivable by middle class American standards. This stuff is so drearily predictable, which is why everyone is so obsessed with location, location, location when deciding where to live. The only way to avoid this stuff is to stay a step ahead of it. The Decline and Fall of the American Republic is being written as we speak. Parenthetically, the complaint about the police being overly militarized is a non-starter. If youre in a battle, you need to be in it to win. The access to excessive force is not a problem, its a necessity. Arbitrarily trying to handicap the situation so that criminal elements have a fighting chance against the police is madness. That said, it need also be noted that this issue is separate from the one of police abuses of power, which is of course a problem to varying degrees in various locations and situations.
Posted on: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 03:40:34 +0000

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015