Interview Of The District Attorney’s Anti-Compliance Today is June 3, 2008. I phoned the S-CV District Attorneys Juvenile Division today at 3:30 PM; I spoke with the clerk about my son’s abduction and being assaulted with a lethal weapon. The clerk transferred me to Nora Hernandez who was helpful, patient and informative. This is a paraphrased verbatim summary: I quickly introduced myself to Nora and gave her a quick review of my first hand experience in trying to procure my son’s arrest report. Nora was very helpful and cooperative. She checked her database for the report and found nothing. She said that it is likely that the District Attorney’s office has not yet received the report and that is why it is not in her database. She also said, verbatim: “Reports come from the court not the DA.” “They have 10 days before the hearing date to submit the file.” “They sometime get the report at the court date.” “They don’t give reports to parents of minors, only attorney’s representing them.” “It is against the law [lie] for them to provide the parents with the reports.” I told Nora about the incident on May 21, 2008 when my son Brennan Bernardino was assaulted with a lethal weapon, kidnapped & terrorized by a local terrorist neighbor (who turned out to be an off duty officer) who held a gun to his head and initiated a false arrest against and planted false evidence for show against my son, according to the declarations to date. I asked Nora if I could submit my investigation & our declarations to the District Attorney prior to the court date. Nora told me No, verbatim: “Charges may not be filed against your son.” “It is up to the District Attorney’s office and there is nothing in their data yet.” “No - you can’t give us your research because that is not how it is done.” I thanked Nora for her time. I let her know that I intend to get that report before the hearing regardless if they are to file charges or not. I debriefed her again on the incident and let her know that is not possible for the District Attorney to make remotely competent indictment evaluation on whether to charge or not when his decision is based a defective, undisclosed “one sided” polemics argument. My son’s declaration is not part of the DA’s file and the owner of the vehicle is not pressing charges, so the only crime committed would be the crime against my son, which you abuse your duty to act on by failing to investigate that aspect of this deliberate indifference hate crime. Nora explained to me that generally, the tickets are given and the District Attorneys office reviews the cases as they come in. The cases should come in at least 10 days before the court date but sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they come in on the court date. When you get to court, the judge lets you know if they have decided to move forward or if they decide to drop the charges. I swear under penalty of perjury the facts presented are paraphrased true. June 3, 2008 By ___________________________ Pollyanna
Posted on: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 10:53:54 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015