It seems the opposition doesnt like hearing the other side. quote: The first deals with the report produced by the CEAA panel which identified some significant environmental effects. Taseko contends the process wasn’t fair and that the panel relied on faulty evidence to reach its conclusion. The second judicial review is centered around the decision by Aglukkaq and cabinet that the significant adverse effects raised by the panel were real and couldn’t be justified.. Answer to date: No, the adverse effects are not real, and its painfully clear on this board it could not be justified. nuff said. :-)
Posted on: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 22:26:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015