Its so funny to think that the History channel has got people thinking that man kind has done absolutely nothing of importance technologically speaking. Meanwhile we are living on the cusp of a technological age that is so soon to overtake the way all life, work, business, transport service, and data transferring is done that soon we wont remember how inconvenient and meaningful our lives were (are) once we are there. People plugged into an engineered perception [I use those words specifically] that teaches them to be certain in all cases that all manner of advanced technologies from ancient technologies like the pyramids, to the various more recent aerial phenomena must have and must always be if not some sort of intervention of OR direct contact with some sort of ancient extra terrestrial race. . no questions. . and they EVEN go as far as to credit the accumulation of Davincis works and epiphanies along with other aspiring figures in history to the genius of the space brothers and their noble intervention with our race. Now at first while I was wildly intrigued by the concept, after a while I was beginning to see (in my own thinking) an insincere sarcasm that grew over me, I started to doubt and dissassociate from all things human. Wanted nothing more than to witness a UFO for myself. .and be given that reassurance. . i was hooked and i was certain (two VERY dangerous things.) After a while i began to see this effect taking place on myself and others. And started observing what i considered to be a quazi-propaganda benefit of some sort to this type of wide based public thinking. Also questioning what these (CLEARLY not factual but theoretical IF that) types of assumptions were doing on the History Channel. What space encounter and ET technology shows are doing on Discovery Channel. To me, the idea is perception engineering. Not on one side of the story but on both (otherwise Hegelian controlled opposition) And I wont sit here and type the pages upon pages of reasons for why I believe this. Though there are dozens of authors who have delved into this topic of the validity of the idea of government cover-up of extra terrestrial technology, suggesting that what you might actually have is a diversion to distract away from very TERRESTRIAL technologies that are way ahead of our thinking, with this cover you would have not only the ability to engineer WHATSOEVER types of technology you see fit manipulating black budgets and military spending. But the real benefit (within societal thinking) is that by engineering the cover story (ufos and extra terrestrials) itself you are engineering the perspective of both stories 1 being mundane, explainable, ordinary and the other being extraordinary, mystifying, and unexplainable. . the wider net catches more fish? And since it is a two sided reality you are creating history on both accounts. What happens with this story next would be all up to the culture that passes the ideas onward. movies, book deals, comics, sci-fi, radio shows, publicity, so called whistleblowers, ex military physicists, (that turn out to be frauds) and all ALL ALL ALL of it is taxed. . think about that for a minute and then ask the question. Why would you want to create fake history? Fauxstory as I like to call it!! Now WHY Is this important and WHY am I writing about it on my facebook page today? Well I would like to point to what these sorts of secondhand theories and speculations come from this sort impartial reporting for ratings and profiteering (which America has so eagerly adopted) have done to how we think critically, and how we weigh evidence against what we know to be factual. . and to what defines factuality itself. Of course everyone feels the same today, things are beginning to look extremely bleak. . and while we are being influenced in all manner of ways that earth is running out of resources and time and that this is all yours and my fault, and as things like water restrictions, curfews, militarized police, lack of public or federal accountability, genetically modified foods being produced for a majority that does NOT want them, less impacting curriculums in school, and more money each year being lost to lack of federal oversight. What all of these things have to do with the History Channel, and the cultural consensus of what humanity is, and what our rights as humans are, and what does all of THAT have to do with the possibility of extra terrestrials? Well, what has come from years of this partial fact checking basis of reporting is the ability of the UFO community to downplay if not eclipse the role of humanity, and go as far as CHANING history ON the history channel to suit their claims. . this is a VERY SLIPPERY SLOPE people, some might even say TREASONOUS in some ways. Now what is the aim here? In my opinion it is a LONG running attempt to influence a docile, un-integral society to ignore the criminal actions of the powers that be and continue to turn the wheels and buy the products and brands which make life so great. What has come is a slow acting contagion growing inside the majority of human consciousness. (for lack of a better way to explain it) which would cause us to grow docile, apathetic, and un-influential to our lives, rights, property, ethics, morality and our own HUMANITY itself. . now why is this important like I was getting at earlier what are the benefits of having a society that is assured of the fact that the human race is nothing better than a plague that destroys for profit. What can you do to a society that has accepted that all it is inherently good for is war and nothing else? lastly I would like (no LOVE) to show how these new held perspectives on human life, rights, and what defines humanity couldnt have come at a more fitting time socioeconomically and technologically speaking. See the real benefit of creating this story comes not ONLY with engineering the Messianic expectation of the Benevolent space brothers that are coming here to save us from the shackles of tyrannical leaderships who are at the whims of the mad banking families. (the people we seem to love but hate, and the people whom I believe are the real ones to benefit from this perception engineering) But if you step back and look at things geo-politically, and start thinking like a mad banker this seemingly overly humanitarian looking philosophy of the future of human kind is nothing more than industry influencing the popular media to accept certain ideals. To me, this has MANY terrible implications. . mainly it appears to be the beginning of a sort of oligarch, socialist mentality. Now understand that this should completely contradict with the reality given the rise in efficient technologies (the ones we know about) and the high aims and claims for space exploration made by experts tell me that we should be expecting a technological age of great surplus for all. But the real story and the money trails imply a completely separate truth. .Ill ask again, What can you do to a society that has accepted that all it is inherently good for is war and nothing else? Well, take the words the former President Ronald Reagan, a quote that he had repeated at least 5 times during his years as president was first disclosed his recurrent thoughts about “an alien threat” on December 4, 1985 during speech at the Fallston High School in Maryland, his words were ( To Gorbachev). “how easy his task and mine might be in these meetings that we held if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet outside in the universe. We’d forget all the little local differences that we have between our countries …” Where most hear this quote and see the smoking gun to the existence of ETs I tend to see a collusive slide of hand routine. . and I am very not alone in this contention. Besides that was not the first time a popular figure in history said this. During a 1955 speech at westpoint General Douglass McArthur told assembled cadets “The next war will be an interplanetary war. The nations of the earth must someday make a common front against attack by people from other planets.” This was not true of course, seeing as how many wars have been fought on earth since. . so what was the point of telling 1 single assembled unit? well, maybe perception engineering. Now the reasons I feel this way are more numerous than I could ever hope to type but maybe this has given SOMEONE something to think about. because the earliest known quote (in America) regarding alien intervention was made by NONE OTHER than John Dewey, and if you know ANYTHING about John Dewey than this fact alone is suspect automatically. He said in New York in 1917, at The Imperial Japanese Mission dinner reception to Viscount Ishyii, he said. Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose. That was almost 100 years ago.
Posted on: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:27:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015