Ive watched this movie with an open mind, intending not to look into the historical facts and just enjoy a good CGI-packed film, that tells the story of my countrys most famous ancestor. But I couldnt, I just could. Theyve went on to use actual names for people and places, that some may think some things are actually true. Absolutely nothing from this movie has to do with reality!!! So, the year is 1442, when the real Vlad the Impaler was 11 years old, having been born in 1431. Hes opposed to the sultan Mehmed II, the future conqueror of Constatinople (present-day Istanbul), who, at the time, was only 10 years old. Yet their characters are a bit older than that, arent day? Then the need to connect Vlad Dracula the Impaler to Transylvania. Theyve made him prince. Uhmm... he wasnt the ruler of Transylvania, he was the ruler of Wallachia, which is just south of Transylvania. He merely stayed imprisoned in Transylvania for a good 12 years. He never ruled Transylvania, as the movie depicts, but I guess they had to stay with the legend, because who cares about history, right?! Then theres the Ottoman side. Mehmed II was a child at the time described in the movie. He did try to come and personally punish the rebellious Vlad, but that happened in 1462, so 20 years later. And he did not die by Vlads hand, although he was almost shot by an arrow of the Wallachian prince during a night attack. One last thing. Theyve totally messed it up with the geography. I mean, look for yourself for the Tihuta passage and Cozia monastery and how you can get from Bran castle to the monastery using that passage. Lets just say that between the buildings and the passage there are some hundreds of kilometers. If youre not taking in consideration the historical facts (which basically dont exist, apart from the resemblance of some names), the movie is rather thin. The story doesnt hold and some parts are kind of forced there so the action might have some coherence - which it lacks, in parts. (I mean, seriously, an army marching miles and miles blind-folded? OK, Ill buy, for the moviess sake, but gathering an entire countrys people to a single monastery...?!?! What were we? The Vatican?! Or someone falling for hundreds of meters and not dying instantly when they hit the ground...) I believe the movie would have been a lot better if they didnt use actual places and figures and they would have kept the persona drafted only from legends, with no historical ground. But its Hollywood, so who cares about history, right?! from one of the reviews of Dracula Untold.
Posted on: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:50:32 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015