JESUS (PBUH) AND HIS BIRTH WAS AN ANCIENT EGYPTIAN (OR ANCIENT MYTH) STORY??? As I said (in the photo that I hallmarked and posted it below) a photo of a women holding a child doesnt prove that the Jesus (pbuh) story was copied (plagiarised). Doesnt every mother hold her child? Yes! Did our mothers not hold us? Would an ancient artefact or painting de-value our (own) historical truth? No it would not... So why do Egyptologists, afrocentrics or any other anti-scriptural critics use a common universal human theme to de-personalise one of Allah (Gods) greatest messenger and prophet? LET ME BREAK DOWN THEIR STUPID CLAIMS.... Their claim that the Jesus (pbuh) story being plagiarised form the ancient Egyptian story of Isis, Horus and Osiris and other ancient texts is not only an attack on christians... Its also an insult and an attack on us Muslims. Jesus (pbuh) is ours... He is a mighty messenger sent by Allah (God)!!! Their so-called assertion that his story was written 1000’s of years before the new testament was written is a total lie... A lie perpetuated by those that also like to call us Muslims Muhammadites and they also think that religion (as a whole) is nothing but a brain washing attempt to enslave people lol. I (personally) feel that a lot of Christians have done a poor job refuting these false accusations and just end up preaching instead of addressing these false claims I have studied these so-called Egyptian myths, Egyptology and other silly cults that run around on Facebook posting rubbish images. They are (for some reason) heavily dependent on the idea that Jesus (peace be upon him) has his roots in some Tamerian or astrological zodiac roots. I debunk such interpretations of those “REPETED FALSE” claims that they copy and paste and are completely reliant on... Yes, they referance “FALSE SOURCES” (to begin with)! The idea that Jesus (pbuh) is a plagiarised solar deity or sun god, in that “Son” of God is the interchangeable equivalently mistranslated “Sun” of God is ridiculous. This may work with bogus English interpretations of the bible, but this doesn’t work in the Quranic language of Arabic, so it is therefore superficial. Before actually attempting to further un-tie Jesus (pbuh) from such bogus claims…. Let me just update peoples theory of Islam. Islam is NOT a copy but a confirmation of the great books that came before it. The Holy Quran is a reforming book, trying to return Ancient Egyptians, Hindus, Jews and Christians to their origins, rather as reformers attempted with the Christian Church centuries later. We believe that Issa or Jesus (pbuh) did exist... We believe (100%) that he was born from our eternal mother the virgin Maryam (or Mary in English). His name was esau in hebrew and Issa in Arabic. The European Christians added the J (in the beginning) and the S (at the end) to Latinize the name (as they latinized the names Jeremiah, Jehovah, John, Joshua, Jacob, Joseph, Jericho, Jachan, Judas etc) and hence why you have Jesus (none of those are actually biblical or their real names). We Muslims also believe he was not God (or His son), but he was a prophet. We believe he was not killed (nor crucified) and hence he was not resurrected from death (so we dont compare their myths to scriptural truths). These are the Islamic beliefs, anything outside what I refute is not an Islamic belief and as such I have no problem accepting the possible influence of a few mythical stories on a few issues. Now, let’s look at these allegations... First one is that Isis was called Mary and that the virgin birth of Jesus is a rip off from Horus. Let me remind those that havent studied ancient texts, there is no evidence which proves Isis was called Mary so I don’t see the link, maybe these fake Egyptologists (or Afrocentric cult following liars) just stuck it in and hoped no one would notice that the names are different loooool. Secondly, Horus was not born of a virgin birth dumb wits. There are many tales of his birth found in so-called historical evidence, three of which are the following: First, is that he was given birth by a falcon, and secondly, was that he was given birth via an egg laid by a goose and thirdly, the most common that, Isis was not a virgin, but the widow of Osiris. Isis practices magic to raise Osiris from the dead so she can bear a son that would avenge his death. Isis then becomes pregnant from the sperm of her deceased husband.... Again, no virgin birth occurs!! (Isis) made to rise up the helpless members (penis) of him whose heart was at rest, she drew from him his essence (sperm), and she made therefrom an heir (Horus). ... Another account says that Osiriss body was cut in 14 pieces, Seth scattered them all over Egypt and his wife Isis retrieved all of them except one, his penis, which was swallowed by a fish... Then Isis supposedly made a wooden replacement. (Reference below, check the story out yourself) ~ Reference...Supposed translations of the Pyramid Texts, Griffiths 1960, pp. 1, 4–7 Im sorry... But this is not a virgin birth. So I suggest that they actually do some serious research before forwarding silly pictures on their pages! There are many other allegations, but you fake current day (so-called) enlightened ancient Egyptian statue worshippers need to seriously get your story correct before tagging me into foolish propaganda, thinking that I wont study this issue!!! ITS NOT JUST AN EGYPTIAN MYTH that the virgin birth idea was ripped off (I hear you mumble)….. Ok... Another one was from the birth of Attis also an ancient mythological god from 1200 years BC. This is false because again, Attis’s mother was actually called Nana – not Mary, and the birth of Attis was not a virgin birth or immaculate conception. The birth was a result of the genitals (penis) of a demon being cut and thrown away, out of which a very special almond tree grew lol nana took the almond, laid it in her bosom and then she gave birth thus the demon was the father of Attis. (Reference below, check the story out yourself) ~Reference... A supposed Lydian connection, based by late 19th-century scholars on a connection with the Atys of Herodotus, and repeated by most modern sources with the exception of Walter Burkert, was examined and dismissed by Jan N. Bremmer, Attis: A Greek God in Anatolian Pessinous and Catullan Rome Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, 57.5, (2004:534-573). Then there is the idea that the virgin birth was ripped off from the story of the ancient Indian mythical character of Krishna from 900 BC, this is also false because Krishna was actually the 8th son of princess Divaki and her husband was Vasudeva (so she wasnt an unmarried Virgin idiots lol). I repeat, if Krishna was the 8th son, then this could not have been a virgin birth (Reference below, check the story out yourself) ~ Referance... Hindu sanskrit scriptures found in the Bhagavad Gita, Mahabharata, Book 12, XLVIII. . Then there is the allegation that the virgin birth idea was ripped off from the story of Dionysus of Greece from 500 BC, which is also false. The myth clearly shows that Dionysuss mother and Zeus had an affair, that affair resulted to Dionysuss birth (not a virgin immaculate conception). So this was not a virgin birth. There are also further accounts of the birth, namely the following: That Zeus impregnates a mortal woman, Semele, much to the jealously of Hera. Hera convinces Semele to ask Zeus to reveal his glory to her but because no mortal can look upon the gods and live, Semele is instantly incinerated (burned). Zeus then takes the fetal Dionysus and sews him into his own thigh until his birth. Dionysus is the product of Zeus and Persephone. Hera becomes insanely jealous and tries to destroy the infant by sending the Titans to kill him. Zeus comes to the rescue but its too late- the Titans had eaten everything but Dionysus heart. Zeus then takes the heart and implants it into the womb of Semele. As we can see, no virgin birth takes place but this is how Dionysus is said to have become a rebirth deity as he is twice born in the womb. (DONT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, CHECK OUT THE REFERENCE BELOW) ~ Reference... Nonnus, Dionysiaca 7.110-8.177 (Dalby 2005, pp. 19–27, 150) I may not 100% agree fully with the Churchs version of the Nativity story... But that does not mean that I will not defend one of Allahs mightiest prophets and messengers Allah Says... And in their footsteps I (Allah) have sent Issa (Jesus) the son of Mariam (Mary), confirming the Law that had come before him... I (Allah) sent him the Gospel: therein was guidance and light, and confirmation of the Law that had come before him... a guidance and an admonition to those who fear Me (Allah) ~Holy Quran, sura Maida, chapter 5 verse 46 I CLOSE WITH THIS VERSE FROM THE HOLY QURAN... But there are, amongst men, those who purchase idle tales of the ancient, without knowledge (or meaning), to mislead (people) from the Path of Allah (God) and they throw ridicule (on the Path) When Our Signs are rehearsed to such people, they turn away in arrogance, as if they heard them not, as if there were deafness in both ears: announce to them a grievous Penalty... But, for those who believe and work righteous deeds, there will be Gardens of pure Bliss, ~Holy Quran, sura Luqman, chapter 31 verse 6-7 Happy Holidays and Ah-salaam alaikom Romeo
Posted on: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:54:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015