Jakarta. Monday’s deadly shootings of unarmed protestors by security forces in Papua that killed as many as five teenagers, has sparked fears that a new era of violence in Indonesia’ easternmost region has begun. Analysts speculate that the recent violence may have been fueled by an emboldened Indonesian Military (TNI) following the president’s announcement last month of his support for the military’s plan to open a new regional military command (Kodam) in Papua. Adriana Elizabeth, a researcher with Indonesia Institute of Sciences (LIPI) said the military may use the deadly incident as a pretext to increase their presence in the troubled area where the separatist Free Papua Movement (OPM) is said to have a presence. “The latest clash also could trigger new misconceptions towards Papuans. The protest has already been attributed to the leadership of a separatist movement, [however] the cause that actually motivated the protest was merely a protest made by people whose children were abused by security officers,” Adriana said. Activists united on Monday to reject the government’s plan to boost the military’s presence in the region, arguing the move would be unnecessary and against Joko’s initial commitment to resolve long-standing human rights issues in the country. A large majority of Indonesia’s current human right abuses, activists say, take place in Papua, where some 16,000 people have been killed since 1969, when 1,025 Papuans selected by the military voted at gunpoint in an “Act of Free Choice” to join the Republic of Indonesia. “The plan to expand the number of regional military commands in Papua is a wrong, desperate and baseless step taken by Joko’s government in an effort to end conflict in the area,” said Haris Azhar, coordinator for the Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence (Kontras), on Tuesday. “That plan should have never been initiated in the first place.” According to the Indonesian Human Rights Monitor (Imparsial), more than 16,000 soldiers are currently deployed in region. Add to that the ranks of local police, and the total number of security officers in Papua exceeds the number of indigenous people, according to activists. The military’s presence in Papua, Hais says, is comparable to martial law applied in Aceh from 1990-1998, when TNI declared the province a military operation region. “The [government’s] plan [to increase the military’s presence] is a form of injustice to indigenous Papuans. With the additional military power, they will feel less secure. The plan must be cancelled immediately,” he added. Poengky Indarty, Imparsial’s executive director, echoed this sentiment, saying the plan was indicative of the state’s poor understanding of the underlying problems now plaguing Papua. “In addition, the president’s plan to form Kodam in Manado and Papua could destroy the ongoing military reform,” Poengky said. “The reform was supposed refine our military’s structure, culture and policy so that it could become a professional national security force. “This also could be a sign that TNI’s role will regress to what it was in [Soeharto’s] New Order era. “Imparsial therefore rejects the plan, and we even urge President Joko to discard existing of regional military command structure in Indonesia,” she added. Soldiers go on duty for nine months on the border between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea to manage territory and maintain the boundaries of the country, in this Nov. 29, 2014 photo. (Antara Photo/R. Rekotomo) Soldiers go on duty for nine months on the border between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea to manage territory and maintain the boundaries of the country, in this Nov. 29, 2014 photo. (Antara Photo/R. Rekotomo) Power breeds violence Increased military presence in Papua will likely exacerbate violence there, Kontras’ Haris said. “The additional number of security forces could trigger more violence in Papua,” Haris said, referring to the latest bloodbath in Paniai district, Enarotali, which took place earlier this week. At least four teenagers were shot dead at the hands of security forces and 21 protesters severely injured, including women and children. Police said they dispatched a special team to the mountainous Paniai district on Tuesday to investigate the incident. National Police deputy chief Comr. Gen. Badrodin Haiti suggested the violence may have been orchestrated by the Free Papua Movement (OPM), which has waged a low-level insurgency against Jakarta for decades on behalf of the mostly ethnic Melanesian population. According to Imparsial’s Poengky, the planned military expansion indicates the seventh president is doubling down on the same security paradigm as his predecessor, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, in viewing the root of Papua’s problems as limited to separatism. The rights activist also questioned commitments Joko made in his presidential campaign, during which the former Jakarta governor vowed to resolve Indonesia’s past and current human rights abuses, including in Papua. The appointment as defense minister of Ryamizad Ryacudu met with widespread criticism by human rights activists, who say the former general’s leadership of several military campaigns in Aceh and Papua, led to widespread human rights abuses. Activists point to Ryamizad’s involvement in operations against the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Free Papua Organization (OPM) as their main objection for what they say is his unsuitability for the job of leading the defense ministry. LIPI’s Adriana questioned the motive behind the state’s intentions to boost military power in Papua. “What is the purpose of this military increment? What does government plan to achieve?” Adriana said on Tuesday. “Whatever their reason, one thing must be underlined: the state security approach won’t end the violence in Papua,” Adriana said. “There’s a valid concern going on that the president himself doesn’t understand what the problem is. “This would also indicate that people around Joko don’t provide him with adequate information about the province,” Adriana added. The researcher emphasized that the government’s plan for additional military forces was not in line with dialogic approach previously proposed by LIPI, arguing that a peaceful dialogue would be the preferable way of ending Papua’s violence and poverty. “For years, the security approach didn’t bear any significant results. Instead, it has fostered a sense of alienation among the indigenous Papuans. Tthey don’t feel like they are a part of Indonesia,” Adriana said. “Military power has failed to provide safety. On the contrary, it has traumatized the people of Papua. The solution must be simultaneous, comprehensive and take into consideration human value,” Adriana said. “Dialogue provides the best avenue for solving Papua’s problems.” Workers loading a boat at Manokwari, West Papua on Dec. 3, 2014. (Antara Photo/Indrianto Eko Suwarso) Workers loading a boat at Manokwari, West Papua on Dec. 3, 2014. (Antara Photo/Indrianto Eko Suwarso) Welfare “In addition, we cannot separate the issues of security and social welfare in Papua,” Adriana said, emphasizing that social welfare in Papua is highly related to the political instability of the region. “But how can the government provide security and welfare if every incidence of violence in the area is associated with a separatist movement?” Adriana said. “Certain parts of the government are quick to politicize every single clash that erupts in the province. That’s a discriminatory way of viewing the region and the problems it faces. We will see no changes in the next five years if the state maintains this attitude,” Adriana said. Despite having disbursed Rp 57 trillion ($4.9 billion) in welfare funds since Papua was granted special autonomy status, or Otsus, in 2001, the province continues to struggle with extreme poverty, poor infrastructure and a severe lack of educational and heath care facilities. Lawmaker Dede Yusuf underlined the dire need for adequate health facilities in the region. “On our visit to Jayawijaya, we discovered that the medical staff and equipment in existing facilities fall far below standard. The area has a very limited range and supply of medication,” Dede said on Tuesday. “Furthermore, the residents are not yet registered with the national health care plan,” he added, referring to the program managed under the country’s Social Insurance Organizing Body, or BPJS. “The conditions we saw were disconcerting to say the least and must be addressed immediately so that the people of Papua may finally receive sufficient and adequate health services,” Dede said. Slow train coming On Monday, President Joko announced government plans to start building a railroad network in Papua next year. “We hope the provincial development agency will support our efforts so that construction can start as soon as possible,” the president said during a teleconference with district heads and governors from Papua and Maluku. “We want the railways to reach Papua’s higher elevated areas,” he said, adding that preliminary studies are projected to last six months, after which construction would immediately start. Railways on the island of Biak, located off the northern coast of Papua, will also be reactivated. “We want the [country’s] railway development to start immediately,” Joko said. “It is high time for the Eastern part of Indonesia to receive more attention from the central government. “We want to start developing together, maintain the unity [of the nation], and manage our border areas,” he added. Further Coverage Editorial: Papua Must Not Be Ignored Any Longer Human Rights Let-Downs Damp Jokowi’s Pledges
Posted on: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:34:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015