Judgement is one thing. Quite a good thing, helpful, and needed nearly every moment of every day. Condemnation, now that is another thing entirely. People dont bother to learn the difference a lot of times, and dont apply their critical thinking to things when they like to repeat new-age rhetoric like no judgement when what they usually really mean in no condemnation. By no judgement they mean I dont want to hear your opinion of this. Judgement is merely your opinion anyway, unless your opinion is given authority by someone. So to say no judgement is to say, I dont want you to have an opinion on this which is quite silly most of the time. You cant ask someone not to have an opinion. You CAN, however, reasonably expect them not to tell you their opinion without you asking for it. Its another one of my favorite mindless illogical new-age bullshit psychopath enabling philosophies. Kind of all falls back to the rule of corpus delicti, doesnt it. See, people fall for these silly fascist concepts because they dont know law, and when you dont know law, you dont know who your boss is, and when you dont know who your boss is you dont know who you are supposed to be listening to and when you dont know who to listen to you dont know what you are supposed to be doing. This is why the SCOTUS wont hear challenges to the 14th amendment....because you are supposed to know what deals you have gotten yourself into. In other words, you are supposed to know who your bosses are. I got news for you. Your GOD is the STATE.
Posted on: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 06:48:39 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015