Kejriwal is a classic case of Hegelian dialectic implementation gone wrong. Hegelian dialect states that a discourse has three stages: 1) Thesis, giving rise to its reaction aka 2) Antithesis, which negates the thesis, and the debate between thesis and antithesis is resolved through the development of a 3) Synthesis. In practical political terms, if you control both the thesis and the antithesis, you can control the synthesis. This is a part of classical late 19th/early 20th century European propaganda execution. Essentially, you must control both sides of the debate to fool the public into developing a synthesis that is predetermined by you. In this case, Congress scams were the thesis. After observing AAP in this election it is now clear that, the IAC movement and AAP were the antithesis. The handlers of the Congress party and the handlers of the IAC/AAP (who many people suspect are the same) thought that by controlling both sides of the debate, they will be able to generate a favorable synthesis. Ideally, it would have resulted in Congress retaining power or AAP gaining power or one of their other front/cronies gaining power. Unfortunately, this attempt has failed miserably as the country switched onto NaMo mania.
Posted on: Thu, 01 May 2014 04:34:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015