Key points: 1. if sakto kang mang rape, why unlock the door? 2. lee said nagmakaawa si vhong but the police said vhong has no reaction, quietly listening. 3. the fact na nang rape ka, as rapist naa kay evidence of wounds or lacerations or bruises but sad to say vhong has none only damages caused by the fatality and brutality done by lees team on the other hand, no signs also for cornejo that she was forced. 4. seeing the statements of cornejo and lee, perfectly planned the way they answer. 5. history repeats itself for lee. 6. there is no such instances that filing a blotter tapos nisugot kag areglo on vhongs side; useless blotter. 7. if ge rape ka, at instant you should seek medical assistance serves as also your evidence na ge rape ka mismo. 8. compare the reaction of cornejos face to those other victims of rape, she was relaxed seems like nothing happened. 9. lee said the 200,000 was said to be payment of the damaged television; wtf????? unsa diay ng t.v ni cornejo silver screen???? 300 inches in size????? 10. truth is, walay lalaki mopatol kung ikaw mismo babaye di ka magpakita ug motibo. 11. vhong is not a drug addict; it is a simple logic. We are not to judge on both sides but as we try to analyze both parties, we think vhong has the right to seek for his justice. He is a good person in and out. God always be with him. #VhongNavarrosCase
Posted on: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:25:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015