LETS SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT!!! IF RACISM WAS TRULY OVER EVERYONE WOULD BE SOME SHADE OF BLACK FROM FAIR LIGHT SKIN BROWN TO JET BLUE BLACK... THEY SURVIVAL IS BASED ON STICKING TO THEIR OWN TO KEEP THEIR GENETIC SURVIVAL GOING WHITE CAN NOT PRODUCE BLACK, BUT BLACK CAN PRODUCE ANY COLOR... IF BLACK PEOPLE ARE IN GROUP TOGETHER & ONE COMMITS A CRIME EVERYONE THERE NOT SNITCHING OR TRYING TO STOP THE CRIME BECOMES AN ACCESSORY TO THE CRIME!!! An accessory is a person/s who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal. The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree: The principal is the one whose acts or omissions, accompanied by the relevant mens rea (Latin for guilty mind), are the most immediate cause of the actus reus (Latin for guilty act). If two or more people are directly responsible for the actus reus, they can be charged as joint principals (see common purpose). The test to distinguish a joint principal from an accessory is whether the defendant independently contributed to causing the actus reus rather than merely giving generalized and/or limited help and encouragement. SO IF ANYBODY NOT GOING AGAINST AND/OR NOT TRYING TO STOP CRIME/NEGATIVITY AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE ARE ACCESSORY TO THE CRIME... WHITE PEOPLE ARE ACCESSORY TO THEIR ANCESTORS & THE CURRENT WHITE PEOPLE IN POWER CRIME AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO RECTIFY/STOP THE CRIMES... LETS TAKE IT A STEP FORWARD LETS USE CONSPIRACY ANYONE THAT HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF CRIMES BEING COMMITTED AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE, AND DONT EVEN HAVE TO COMMIT THE CRIME IS STILL GUILTY OF CONSPIRACY... Conspiracy: An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself, but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors. Conspiracy is a crime separate from the criminal act for which it is developed. MANDATORY SENTENCING FOR ACCESSORY TO A CRIME MANDATORY SENTENCING FOR ACCESSORY TO A CRIME: DEPENDING ON THE CRIME WHICH THEY COMMITTED EVERYONE AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE IS 10-20-Life Felons Mandatory Minimum dc.state.fl.us/pub/10-20-life/crimes-mandatory.html The maximum penalty for conspiracy is usually limited to the maximum punishment fixed for the crime that the conspirators conspired to commit. A court can grant a sentence in a crime of conspiracy to the extent of the maximum punishment fixed for the crime. Some state laws do not require a strict ratio between crime and sentence. However, the sentence must not be extremely inconsistent with the severity of the crime[iii]. An enhanced sentence can be given considering the nature and circumstances of the offense committed. A conspiracy to kill or injure a person is a crime of violence and the conspirator to that crime would be sentenced based on the rules of sentencing related to a crime based on the use of physical force. The gravity of the offense will be considered and the conspirators are subject to enhanced punishment. Likewise, if the crime was not due to a sudden provocation but planned, the crime is more severe and the sentence could be more severe[iv]. Under some state laws, the trial court’s sentence can be reversed only on appeal: if it violates constitutional requirements; if a judge was influenced by ill-will, prejudice, or impermissible considerations; or if the sentence exceeded the limit prescribed by a statute[v]. Generally, criminal procedures permit multiple sentencing. Hence it does not violate the Constitution[vi]. For example, a federal statute provides that, whoever is being prosecuted for any crime of violence or drug trafficking, if he/she uses or carries a firearm in relation to that crime, they may be sentenced to an additional period apart from the sentence for the original crime[vii]. [i] Knight v. Hopkins, 828 F. Supp. 680 (D. Neb. 1993) [ii] State v. Bell, 242 Neb. 138 (Neb. 1992) [iii] Kinnel v. Farley, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4518 (7th Cir. Ind. Mar. 10, 1994) [iv] United States v. De Angelo, 167 F.3d 1167 (7th Cir. Wis. 1999) [v] Medley v. State, 386 Md. 3 (Md. 2005 [vi] United States v. Staggs, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16228 (9th Cir. Haw. July 10, 1998) [vii] 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c)(1) - See more at: conspiracy.uslegal/punishment-and-sentencing/#sthash.T4eO3Hoy.dpuf BASICALLY IF YOU USE THE LAWS/PENAL CODES ACROSS THE BOARD MANY PEOPLE ARE GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE WITH LEGAL LAW...
Posted on: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:27:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015