Left / Right, Spoiler/Agitator, common sense gets shoved in a box. Whats real about the political news in the mainstream media - political reality or manufactured perception? Why are common public interests dangerous? Maybe the agitation is really held by the elites, and maybe the only thing that is spoiled is the perceptions they offer the public as free press. Big banks are the best we can do - really? Who defines what is possible? In theory, as everyone knows, for our constitutional republic, We the People. In reality, Capitol Hill might as well be re-named Corporate Hill, with little help from our free press, owned and operated by elites. Framing and categorizing popular interests - like permanently tossing the notion of banks too big to fail - as trouble for candidates says a lot about our media and our system of government. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein or Cynthia McKinney would all challenge the corporate and financial elites policy coup détat on the USA, which is more important than any weak characterization from the Washington Post or any of the crap mainstream media. If Sen. Bernie Sanders runs for president, the Washington Post wonders whether hell be an agitator or a spoiler. - Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting fyi, according to Wikipedia, Populism is a political doctrine where one sides with the people against the elites.
Posted on: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:12:56 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015