Like the sentiment, although it assumes that people are rational game players that can collectively agree on new goals. It doesnt directly challenge the operating system that facilitates the game, owns the playing field and the dice. When the goal overtly challenges the inequity that capitalism must promote and protect, then we will have a game changer. The choice is pretty simple, either we beat them at their own game, or we walk off the field and taking our bats and balls with us. For obvious reasons I am coming to the conclusion that collective withdrawal, rather than engagement, is the best solution. There is also something a little off in treating a system that is literally killing planet and people as a benign game.
Posted on: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 02:41:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015