MATTHEWS GREENPEACE/ GREEN POLITICAL ETHOS SUGGESTION UPDATED VERSION RE: DA ENVIRONMENT IS DA ECONOMY............because: Money represents energy value as a proportionate relative value of energy in relation wiv value of gold, or oil barrol etc. Money/energy/money/energy(energy=money).. & money is da medium (universal language) 2transfer its value 2one form 2da next as required by money/credit energy token holder wishing2 make purchase of product(i.e. new coat), service(i.e hair cut), energy(fuel),or just static savings in a bank which again is simply just a relative value energy token dependant on da economy. Our environment (da world) has (in every wave or partial mass form a relative value of energy in different volumes, proportions, values, states etc, etc .SO.......BECAUSE all energy is derived/resourced directly from da environment (& our sun)......it means that da.ENVIRONMENT itself must be DA ECONOMY, thus da environment IS MONEY simply cos its energy! I fink there4 when environmentalists preach that pollution often described as a negative is a wasted bi product of excess energy transfer (i.e 1 passenger travelling in a massive double decker bus or train/plane) , thus any transportation design efficiency should be centred around da minimum energy required 2 transport load if environmentalist r right that pollution should be in our common mutual interests kept 2 a minimal . Thats y Ill never buy a car, cos Id b using up excess energy that should b shared 4 users whom buy cars 4 transporting as many persons as there r car seats in da vehicle/car. So unless da major car companies build a petrol/diesel mono car thats truly designed with just enough power & weight of material 2 transport a single person, ill never buy a car. DA MARKET 4 A MONO NEW AGE car exists & da need 2ease traffic congestion & problems caused by car storage issues along wiv reducing CO2 I fink would hav a positive effect on da economy. Cause they would be more energy available in direct useable state 2share more proportionately 4every1 on planet earth. A bus & car may well find a cyclist on da road offensive, & yeah they r right in a way, cyclists go slower so we get in da bloody way, SORRY. So also r cyclists finding da fumes offensive when cars/buses overtake, & so should car, bus, motorbike users cos they breath it in2. I find a bus less offensive when its full of passengers than when its empty & so would bus company shareholders, a full bus overtaking cyclist is like 20cars passing by but wiv much less material mass required energy. ALL road users would benefit from a cycle lane (everywhere) & Id be happy cyclist paying a bike tax 2make it happen SO US cyclists wouldnt b in DA BLOODY WAY. Every1s right but I think a narrower than standard car mono car would solve ALL da pollution & safety & congestion & car park issues that r an ascending issue required some innovative democratic engineering solution. PLEASE car companies build a mono car!!!!
Posted on: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:06:16 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015