MORE ON GOLD 20140628 mike montagne — Saturday, June 28, 2014 at 11:21:33 AM PST | Saturday, June 28, 2014 at 6:21:33 PM GMT: Thanks to Gavin Davidson in private dialog. [6/28/14 5:40:08 AM] MPE™ Gavin Davidson: I feel a rant coming on. Im sure that this Silver Bullet Siver Shield guy is probably well intentioned. Ive listened to some of his stuff before, and he is aware of a lot of the problems. He does however, suffer from the usual obsessive rhetoric, about how if only we could return to the Constitution, all would be well. If only that were true. He of course totally misses the most glaring of points. If only he could admit to himself, the glaring contradictions in this video of his for starters. Twice he undermines his own base line position on a return to precious metals as a standard for money ... openly, if inadvertently, admitting, that the British actually USED an enforced return to a silver standard (they had a virtual monopoly on the stuff!) to devastate the economy of the Colonies. But ... he still wants us to return to that?? Hmmmm. Tell me again how thats going to pan out? Of course, theres also the usual quoting of the non-Jefferson inflation/deflation quote ... all ending with a sales spiel for his own silver coins. All very depressing really. Sure ... in the event of a melt down in paper currencies, silver COULD be a useful insurance policy ... but then again, so could fricking toilet paper. What he fails to understand, is that the technology, and the political will, to turn the worlds economy onto a cashless society is in full flow right now (rumour has it that Israel will be the first country to roll it out), and that that option was simply not possible back in the days of the American Revolution. So its harldy likely that the Money Changers are going to allow a return to anonymous silver, when they can have a 100% trackable cashless society! So will this guys stash and stacks of silver coins make him an overnight gazillionaire one day? I doubt it, very much. Apart form that, the whole concept of relying on precious metals, that central banks have a virtual 100% monopoly on anyway, is just so beggarly. It turns men into competing mice; mice that are happy to scurry around, picking up the crumbs that fall from the banquetting table of the Money Changers. And how safe are they going to feel anyway, if and when their silver ever IS worth $100,000 an ounce, as many of them predict it will be worth, in the aftermath of a global economic meltdown? Not very Id say. With only a tiny proportion of the population having ANY silver, at all, how are they proposing that theyre going to be able to spend it, without word getting around that they must have a secret stash of silver (the only form of money?) in their home? The uzzi 9 milimetre wielding gangs would be around in 5 minutes to take it all away from them anyway! However, despite the inaccuracies, there are some interesting bits of history in this video, not to mention an intriguing dramatization of a conversation between Franklin and the banker/plant/stooge/snake in the grass, Alexander Traitor Hamilton. https://youtube/watch?v=okjVkTwDv20 [6/28/14 11:20:11 AM] mike montagne: The last thing the gold bugs want to return to is any one of the prior standardS which never, never, never stabilized the spending power of a dollar toward *any other thing*. They have $1,275/oz in gold right now. Do they want the dollar to return to $20? To $32? To $40? Absolutely not. Rather than the prior standardS they want a new standard to reach $5,000. Their real idea, in all this false swooning over a Constitution *they do not* want to return to, is that they make $4,000/oz on the gold theyre hoarding — falsely driving up the price of gold by artificial demand. But gold is plummeting, and instead, may only be destined to plummet under the present terminal obfuscation, because when the rest of the S hits the fan in the near end of this thing... *you cant ***eat*** gold* — and so that gold is prospectively going to disappear for a few tomato seeds if the false constitutionalist who advocates *not* a return to the former Constitution, but a punch to our noses which gives them license to revise the standard they plea for that they may make out like bandits. Gold will never reach the magic number they aspire for themselves, before this system crashes. And whatever number it may reach nonetheless, how little circulation will we be left with when they translate that to a standard (of *many* purported standardS)... which will vastly constrict our circulation all the further? They dont even have a plan to dispossess your ostensibly excess circulation (compromised representation of entitlement). This after all is their premise — a mere *claim* that we suffer from an excess circulation. What their plea translates to then, is let us deprive you of even more representation of entitlement, that you may prosper from that denial and no one ever did. The problem isnt an excess of money (representation of entitlement). The problem is that money has been compromised in such a way as perpetually multiplies faux debt — both denying us of an adequate circulation (due representation of entitlement), and dedicating practically all of what little were left, instead to servicing the escalation of faux debt — as opposed to sustaining the industry and commerce which are *wrongly* and artificially obliged to do so. Fix the problem, and what is gold? Gold is absolutely irrelevant to the vital reparation; and worse, a) perpetual pleas for gold only obstruct us from *actual* solution then; whereas, b) furthermore, re-adoption even of *this lie* of returning to [yet a different, false] gold standarD, only exacerbates the lack of sufficient circulation which indeed puts us at the very brink of a terminal failure we suffer not for the lack of gold, but for the intentional obfuscation of our currency which *any and every* lie of a gold standard, too sustains. The gold people have *always* been *all talk*. mike montagne founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, original (1968) architect of mathematically perfected economy™, and principal author of the global amendment for mathematically perfected economy and absolute consensual representation™ perfectedeconomy.org (C) Copyright 2014 by mike montagne and PFMPE™.
Posted on: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 18:29:46 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015