Madam speaker sir; as we critique it there r some who 4 some reason choose to guide us as to how to go about it, they r welcome but their advise remains just that. It is also alleged that Dr. Nasha said those who hold different perspective to hers should pen their own & surely I will & consequently start from henceforth. While I am waiting 4 my copy which I am already working hard to get, I will continue to rely on hearsay, excerpts though some in the media believe others within same may mislead (a topic) 4 another day. It is reported that Nasha narrates how the nation uncritically & overwhelmingly embraced the appointment of Khama Vice President. When Khama became VP, it was at the time when BNF was embroiled in debilitating feud which were exacerbated by his coming into equation. The party was further polarized between those who preferred Khama (Kenneth Koma & K Kalake) on 1 hand & those who didnt (backed David Magang instead). Much as it is true most embraced him uncritically & with unprecedented aplomb, hence gullible, it was equally incumbent upon BDP leaders (including Mma Nasha) to emulate some of us (who like John The Baptist, our voices were drowning in the wilderness) & provide leadership that she now decries. The majority of those who founded BCP (myself included) contrary to that some were bought, saw Kenneth Komas endorsing Ian Khama (among other issues) as not only offending the principles that bound us to BNF but also as a dangerous trajectory we would rather not associate with, which we were prepared to severe our political ties even. I am here reminded of my principled position on Ndaba which bears some similarities, that is largely viewed in some quarters with distaste.
Posted on: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:29:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015