Mail Sent to Chancellor on 14/8/2013 Date: 14/08/2013 To The Chancellor & Members, BoM, IIIT Allahabad Sub: Complain Against Prof. O P Vyas, Member Secretary, BoM, IIITA Respected Sir, Very politely, I want to put before you the deed of Prof. O.P. Vyas by which he tried to mislead the Honorable Court and tried to interfere with the appointment process of Director, IIIT Allahabad, initiated by MHRD, GoI to benefit the present Director of the Institute Dr. M.D. Tiwari. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE CASE 1. Prof. O. P. Vyas is the member of present Board of Management of IIIT Allahabad. 2. He very well knows that IIIT-Allahabad has adopted UGC regulations on 15/11/2011 and since then UGC Regulations are applicable in the Institute. 3. There are two UGC regulations which are applicable to the universities which adopted UGC regulations namely [UGC (Institutions Deemed to be University) Regulations, 2010] and UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2010. 4. These regulations are statutory provisions and need to be followed in toto in the functioning of the Institute. 5. The para 7.3.0 (i) of UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2010 on page 47 mentions the qualification of Vice- Chancellor/ Director as: Persons of the highest level of competence, integrity, morals and institutional commitment are to be appointed as Vice-Chancellors.. The Vice-Chancellor to be appointed should be a distinguished academician, with a minimum of ten years of experience as Professor in a University system or ten years of experience in an equivalent position in a reputed research and / or academic administrative organization. 6. Prof. Vyas became professor in 2004, and according to the above rule it is clear that he is not eligible for the post of director. But to stop the appointment process of Director IIIT-A, initiated by MHRD GoI, he claimed that he is eligible and forerunner for the post of Director and requested injunction in the case. Here it is important to mention that at the time of his case he was having less than 10 years of experience on the post of professor. (Qualification of Prof. Vyas is enclosed as annexure 1). 7. Prof. O. P. Vyas was having full knowledge about the regulations and its adoption. In spite of that he filed a case in the lower court to challenge the appointment process initiated by MHRD, GoI for the appointment of new Director for IIITA. 8. The first case application MCA no 276 of 2013 was filed on 22nd March, 2013 which was rejected on 23rd March, 2013 by Hon’ble court. (Detail of case enclosed as annexure 2). Kindly read the prayer in annexure 2 (page 2) in which Prof. Vyas asked the court to provide exemption to him for filing the suit without serving notice. This clearly reflects his desperation and association with Dr. M.D. Tiwari to get a stay for the appointment of new Director in IIIT-A. The decision of the court can be read in detail in annexure 2 page 4. 9. Then Prof. Vyas has filed a revision on 25th March 2013, which was also rejected. (Detail of cases and order is enclosed as annexure 3). Kindly read the judgment (para 2) on page 4 of annexure 3. 10. Prof. Vyas was so desperate to stop the appointment process for IIITA Director that he has filed a review case with civil revision no 95 of 2013, which was also rejected by the court. (Detail of cases and order is enclosed as annexure 4) ALLEGATIONS 1. The motive of Prof. Vyas was to benefit the present director of IIITA, Dr. MD Tiwari, so that he can get favor against his efforts to ensure continuance of Dr. MD Tiwari after the expiry of his term of office (i.e. 26/06/2013). 2. Who has paid money for the cases. 3. The appointment of his wife Dr. Ranjana Vyas as Assistant Professor in IIIT-A is the gift of his efforts. Here it is important to mention that the appointment of Dr. Ranjana Vyas is also challenged in High Court, Allahabad (Writ No.. 18354 of 2013 and Writ No 29200 of 2013) for flouting the rules in her appointment. 4. Instantly, after her appointment, she is appointed as Warden of Girls Hostel. 5. According to CPC Order – 39 Rule 2 (ii) (a): No suit is maintainable which effects the internal management or affairs of any educational Institution including the University or Society. 6. Provisions of Rule 39 (2)(ii) (h), no suit can be maintainable in cases where reference could be made to Chancellor of University under any enactment. To the extent, any injunction granted in contravention of these provisions shall be void. 7. Point no. 5 & 6 clearly state that his suits were not maintainable in the lower court, in spite of the above rules how his counsel advised his to file the case. Under whose influence the counsel was operating. DEMANDS 1. Prof. Vyas shall be removed from the membership of BoM of IIITA immediately. 2. Prof. Vyas shall be removed from the post of secretary of BoM of IIITA immediately. 3. An enquiry shall be conducted to find why and under whose benefit he filed these cases. 4. From where the money came to fight the cases. 5. An enquiry should be constituted on the appointment of his wife Dr. Ranjana Vyas to find whether the appointment is the gift of his act to protect present Director Dr. MD Tiwari. Looking forward for your support to keep up the ethics involved in an academic institute. With best regards (Rahul Gupta) Research Scholar IIIT Allahabad
Posted on: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:09:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015