My how your story changes. Youre grasping at straws, dear. Did your lawyer think that maybe they did look at the new evidence and found it immaterial? Heres some evidence you like to glaze over as you repeat he saved his men, not a weapon, not a cell phone, nor even a loose nut was found on those men or the motorcycle, and where they were at put them in full view of the COP and the ANA where no other civilians could see them. They werent spotting, they had zero means with which to harm us, so no, he didnt save anyone. But here is what we do know, we know he threatened the locals and shot into their village unprovoked (theres pictures of this event), we know he threatened them again when they came to complain in the morning, and we know he ordered the killing of two unarmed men in every sense of the word. Then, as if by happenstance while he was yanking people out of their homes, we got into a second engagement, you could even say it was probably retaliation for the two days events because we had never been engaged in that village before that day. He saved us? Lady, because of his desire to kill Afghans he put our lives in even more risk, and now he and you are trying to hide behind ROE to justify it.
Posted on: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:59:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015