NPPs ACCUSATION GALORE OF THE ONGOING SUPREME COURT PETITION!!! - TopicsExpress



          

NPPs ACCUSATION GALORE OF THE ONGOING SUPREME COURT PETITION!!! (1).They raised an alarm on Justice William Atuguba as the President of the Supreme Court who was going to sit on their case. They quickly made a U-turn when they realized that they had made a very bad mistake, by attacking the integrity of the Supreme court Ghana. (2).They’ve accused the nine Justices of being too strong on Lawyer Addison but very soft on both Lawyers Tsikata and Lithur. (3). They say even Justice Baffoe Bonnie shouted on Lawyer Addison to keep quiet when he (Baffoe Bonnie) was talking. They attribute that to intimidation. They are therefore encouraging Lawyer Addison to be hard and tough on the Justices, thinking that, that might help them have a draw in their case. (4). The NPP are now saying the Justices should not have allowed the pink sheets to be counted at all by KPMG. They said the pink sheets should have been counted even before the start of the case. (5). They are also asking the court why they let KPMG use the pink sheet set in the office of Justice Atuguba as the control mechanism and not any of the other eight Justices. In other words, KPMG should have randomly picked which set they would use as the control mechanism. Again. (6). The NPP are questioning the rationale for the court to allow Lawyer Tsikata to tender the pink sheet from Asokwa but did not allow Lawyer Addison to tender the collation sheets for some constituencies. (7).They have signaled that Lawyer Addison would introduce the collation sheets again and if they are not accepted, they will go on demonstration. (8).The NPP are also accusing the Supreme Court of asking Lawyer Addison to keep track of his line of questions and avoid repetitive questions, but the same court allowed Lawyer Tsikata to repeat his questions to Dr. Bawumia for 13 good days. (9).They are also accusing the Justices of helping Dr. Afari Gyan in answering his questions. For example, on one pink sheet, Lawyer Addison mentioned the figure 22 to Dr. Afari Gyan which he confirmed. A Judge looked at the figure and said he saw 77. Lawyer Addison told the Judge that Dr. Afari Gyan has confirmed the figure. That was when the Judge told Lawyer Addison that “we are all here to find the truth.” In fact, the correct figure was 77, and so there was no over-voting on that pink sheet. (10).The NPP are accusing the Supreme Court Judges of helping Lawyer Quarshie-Idun to frustrate Lawyer Addison by upholding his objections on all the important questions that Lawyer Addison will ask Dr. Afari Gyan. (11) They also accused the judges that any important document Lawyer Addison trys to tender as evidence is also rejected because Lawyer Quarshie-Idun claims he does not have them. . I know the list of accusations has not ended since Lawyer Addison is still cross-examining and the issue of the KPMG audit has not even come up yet. via: Abdul Aziz
Posted on: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:32:12 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015