Not Answering the Papua Special Autonomy Issues _ are suggested by: Budhy, Raimond. Tabuni Not Answering the Papua Special Autonomy Issues.. buditabuni are suggested by: Budhy, Raimond. Tabuni For nine years , the implementation of special autonomy ( SAF ) in Papua which includes Papua and West Papua . However , the Special Autonomy Law is not the welfare of the indigenous people of Papua , in fact it becomes a trigger of conflict , so the Papuan Peoples Assembly ( MRP ) to return the special autonomy to the central government through the DPRP and the House of Representatives in Senayan, Jakarta ,Jakarta.tanahpapuaSome residents of the rival group , carrying a bow and spear traditional war dance when on alert in anticipation of attacks by their opponents in New Mimika District , Timika , Papua , some time ago . Disputes that occur between people that left at least eight people were killed and dozens more injured . The situation in Papua with the inclusion of special autonomy fund ( SAF ) of the government can not improve the life of small communities , especially indigenous Papuans living in the interior . The special autonomy fund does not reach them .Since stipulated in Law No. 21 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for Papua Province , central government funds flowed for more than 9 years of Rp 28 trillion . However , these funds have not been raised self-esteem and human dignity Papua hosted in their own country .Nevertheless, Papua Governor Barnabas Suebu who appeared as one of the speakers in the discussion and book launch Papua Road Map , recently stated , the flow of funds is quite large , but the level of difficulty and costliness in Papua led to many people who do not tersejahterakan .Government set , Papua into regions with special autonomy ( SAF ) since 21 November 2001 with the aim of increasing the confidence of the people and resolve problems that occur there . However , it is not the welfare of special autonomy in Papua because the central government released funds amounting to Rp 1 trillion per year is thought to be a soft food corruption by rogue elements not responsible . SAF down before the government set up the equipment area to manage . So , open space for corruption . Autonomy does not answer the problem of Papua , said Barnabas .Barnabas did not mention Papua special autonomy failed miserably , because many are already built in Papua . It is said that before the program Village Development Strategy Plan ( Respect ) , the special autonomy fund does not touch the little people in the villages . Thus, there is a reasonable call SAF program is not successful . Macroeconomic , roads , and cities are built , but the little people in the villages do not get anything . In fact , the special autonomy policy arises because people in the interior villages or shout Papua Merdeka .It should be noted also that the issues raised in Papua is not just a matter of well-being but also conflict with the settlers . This is evidenced by the issuance of the Decree of the Papuan Peoples Assembly ( MRP ) No14 of 2009 which contained a provision that the head of the region must be indigenous Papuans .Addressing various conflicts in Papua , Barnabas who served as Governor of Papua for the second time stated , Papua greater need leaders with strong leadership to end the conflict and create a clean administration area . There needs to be reform of the bureaucracy and the budget to run the government in Papua . To date , of the government has been going pretty well , he said .What is disclosed Barnabas is debatable , but the assessment of good enough can be seen from the results of the CPC , which was rated fair with exception after previous Disclaimer . Barnabas also admitted , still needs improvement at the district level in the form of efforts to prevent corruption .Papua , he added, need accelerated development of infrastructure , such as roads , telecommunications networks , and energy . Because , with an area of 420 540 square kilometers , the natural wealth that can not be utilized properly due to lack of infrastructure .The issue of infrastructure development in Papua does require commitment . As is known , the cost of infrastructure development there is very expensive . The governor even assuming , took Rp 500 trillion, equivalent to 500 years , if calculated from the special autonomy fund of Rp 1 trillion per year , to build infrastructure . Therefore , the proper solution is to build infrastructure gradually and continuously .Related to the welfare of the Papuan people also need support facilities such as education and health facilities . Barnabas states , education and health facilities available today is still lacking . Thus , it is very difficult to access by those who live in rural areas and mountains .Clinic in Papua so far . In fact , it should be on a plane to go to the clinic . Of the 3,000 villages in Papua , health centers can only be found in 40 points , said former Ambassador to Mexico , Honduras and Panama this .More male births in Sentani , Jayapura , Papua , 29 April 1946 stated Papua also need good law enforcement , there is no violation of human rights ( Human Rights ) . Thus, the unity of law and order in Papua created . Law and Order should be enforced in Papua . In other words , Papua require more police than the army , said the man who will be serving as the Governor of Papua until 2011. part ConflictAutonomy existence that can not be the solution to the Papuan also declared Team Coordinator Papua Indonesian Institute of Sciences ( LIPI ) Muridan S Widjojo . In fact , according Autonomy which has been running for nine years it becomes part of the conflict in Papua .In fact , Law No.21/2001 political intention is to address the root problem that afflicts four Papua , namely the failure of development , marginalization and discrimination of indigenous Papuans , state violence and allegations of human rights violations , as well as the historical and political status of Papua. In the book of Papua Road Map published LIPI mengukapkan sources of conflict in Papua grouped empart issue . First , the problem of marginalization and discriminatory effect of the Papuan people as a result of economic development , political conflict , and mass migration to Papua since 1970 . To answer this problem , recognition of alternative policies need to be developed to empower indigenous Papuans .The second issue is the failure of development especially in the areas of education , health and economic empowerment of the people . It required some sort of new paradigm of development that focuses on the improvement of public services for the welfare of indigenous Papuans in the villages .The third major problem is the contradiction of history and the construction of political identities between Papua and Jakarta . This problem can only be solved by dialogue as has been done for Aceh .The fourth issue is accountability for past state violence against Indonesian citizens in Papua . For that , the path of reconciliation between human rights court ( HAM ) and truth are the options for law enforcement and justice for Papua in general . These four issues and agendas above can be designed as a policy strategy related to cross the Papua conflict resolution as a whole in the long run .For example , the word Muridan , in Jayapura and other towns with thousands of indigenous peoples MRP restore autonomy. Correspondingly, the demand for international dialogue and a referendum continues to strengthen . Of course , dialogue is not a new taboo because the value is equal to musyawaragh consensus . It was diamatkan the special autonomy law violations resolve issues in a fair and dignified dialogue kemanusiaa .The same thing is also said to be the Secretary General of the Council of National Defense Lt. Gen. Bambang Darmono . According to him , the failure of special autonomy in Papua has complicated the situation today. Once , the failure of law enforcement issues that could potentially be a violation of human rights and a culture of violence that is so characteristic of the people of Papua and Papua sense of marginalized people .According to members of the House of Representatives Electoral District of Papua Yorrys Raweyai essential to touch the lives of the indigenous people of Papua , special autonomy funds must be used appropriately in the realization of the four areas set out in the Act. Namely the construction of the field of Education , Health , Peoples Economy and infrastructure development . Funds are to be focused on these fields , and is separated from the state budget to fund the budget and transparent use. Therefore, it can improve the life of the indigenous people of Papua , he said .In addition, the Coordinating Board should be formed so that the implementation of special autonomy to control the utilization of these funds . The principle is to prevent the occurrence of corruption in the use of special autonomy fund .In connection with the corruption of special autonomy funds , Chairman Komis A Papuan Legislative Council ( DPRP ) Ruben Magai supports the statement by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono requesting immediate audit of special autonomy funds so as to prevent the increasingly rampant corruption within the government in Papua and West Papua . Thus the special autonomy funds actually utilized for the welfare of the indigenous people of Papua within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is not otherwise benefit a particular party . ( Various sources )
Posted on: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:24:05 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015