Not totally sure if I agree with all of the implications of - TopicsExpress



          

Not totally sure if I agree with all of the implications of Dawkins characterization of religion as a virus, though it does make cursory sense given how it infects and its negative impact on human affairs. However, I do take exception to the notion, always unsupported, that its all-too-obvious negative impacts outweigh its positive ones since the positive ones fly almost always under the radar of possible measurement. How can one compare what is basically impossible to measure?
Posted on: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:19:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015