OH, and one more thing: “Slaters protestations to the effect that he derives no benefit from the United States government have no bearing on his legal obligation to pay income taxes.* Unless the defendant can establish that he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS possesses authority to attempt to determine his federal tax liability.” ~United States of America v. William M. Slater (D. Delaware) 545 F.Supp 179, 182 (1982) ------- Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47, 44 S.Ct. 444, 68 L.Ed. 895 (1924); Benitez Rexach v. United States, 390 F.2d 631, (1st Circ.), cert. denied 393 U.S. 833, 89 S.Ct. 103, 21 L.Ed.2d 103 (1968). UNLESS THE DEFENDANT CAN ESTABLISH THAT HE IS NOT A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES... UNLESS you can establish that fact, you are liable for the income tax. Starting to understand why expatriation is the key yet? Remember, once you correct your nationality to that of your de jure State of the union (ie. New Yorker), you can live in the same territory that the de facto United States occupies, without being a US Citizen liable to their bullshit. Know law.
Posted on: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:49:42 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015