Obama hit for hedging on ‘terrorist’ attack, unlike Canadian PM Published October 23, 2014 ·FoxNews Facebook 334 Twitter 153 livefyre 1289 Email Print Now Playing Canadian officials: Ottawa gunman acted alone in terror plot Never autoplay videos President Obama is taking heat for seeming to hedge on whether Wednesdays attack on Canadas government complex was an act of terrorism, even as Canadas prime minister declared that his country was a victim of a terrorist. U.S. lawmakers already are noting a contrast in the way Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the U.S. president have addressed the subject. Details still are emerging about the gunman, but reports say he recently converted to Islam and desperately wanted to move to the Middle East. The attack came just one day after Canada raised its terror alert and two days after another jihadist convert, Martin Couture-Rouleau, killed a uniformed Canadian soldier in a hit-and-run in Quebec. Couture-Rouleau, who was killed by police, had recently had his passport seized to bar him from traveling to join the Islamic State, or ISIS. The Obama administration had said little until Wednesday about the hit-and-run, which came shortly after Canadas Parliament voted to join the U.S.-led airstrike campaign against ISIS. Late Wednesday, Obama addressed both attacks after speaking with Harper. The president stressed they dont yet have all the information about what motivated the shooting and whether this was part of a broader network or plan or whether this was an individual or series of individuals who decided to take these actions. Obama added: But it emphasizes the degree to which we have to remain vigilant when it comes to dealing with these kinds of acts of senseless violence or terrorism. He said it is important to recognize that when it comes to dealing with terrorist activity that Canada and the United States has to be entirely in sync. Absent was a direct reference to the gunman in Wednesdays shooting being a terrorist. Earlier in the day, perhaps reflecting a desire not to get ahead of Ottawa in describing the attack, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said he was not in a position to render a judgment on whether the attack was terrorism. By contrast, Harper was unequivocal in declaring in a televised address late Wednesday that the attacker was a terrorist. He said the Canadian soldier who died was murdered in cold blood as he provided a ceremonial honor guard at Canadas National War Memorial. He said the soldier killed earlier in the week was also struck by an ISIL-inspired terrorist. The prime minister declared: We will not be intimidated. Harper repeated that message in an address on Thursday to Parliament, saying, We will not run scared. Describing the threat, he said, It is hard to appreciate, understand, fathom, how we can have people who so despise or are involved in a movement who so want violence ... How they can kill, want to kill anyone who looks or thinks different from them. U.S. lawmakers noted a difference in how Obama tackled the subject. Im very encouraged to hear Prime Minister Harper really speak the truth, Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., told Fox News. He noted that the U.S. government still will not describe the 2009 Fort Hood massacre as terrorism, instead using the term workplace violence. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told Fox News: When you see an honor guard killed -- murdered -- you have got to start with the idea that this is terrorism, not just, Hey, lets downplay this. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said the U.S. government needs to be more aggressive in monitoring for lone-wolf terrorism. The Obama administration long has faced Republican criticism that it avoids terms like Islamic terrorism, following attacks ranging from the Fort Hood massacre to the 2012 Benghazi attack, which the administration initially blamed on a protest gone awry.
Posted on: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:22:13 +0000