Of particular interest here, for my Red State friends, is former - TopicsExpress

Dow Harris

Of particular interest here, for my Red State friends, is former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury to the Reagan Administration, Paul Craig Roberts comments beginning at 2:45 (https://youtube/watch?v=e0q7zIfjOB8): The United States has an ideology of world hegemony that does not accept any prospect of any country being sovereign and acting on its own. You have to be an American vassal state... Roberts attributes this to the ascendancy of Neoconservatism in the Republican party, as have many others. However, (for my blue state friends) key Neoconservative Robert Kagan is now courting Hillary Clinton ( nytimes/2014/06/16/us/politics/historians-critique-of-obama-foreign-policy-is-brought-alive-by-events-in-iraq.html and also here: nytimes/2014/07/06/opinion/sunday/are-neocons-getting-ready-to-ally-with-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0 ). The only difference will be that they will call it Liberal Interventionism instead of Neoconservatism. So, really, what is the difference between the two parties? Both are going to escalate tension and war elsewhere in the world. The only difference will be that one approach is passive and the other is aggressive. Can we really afford to continue under our current political system any longer? What alternatives are there?

Posted on: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:48:47 +0000

Of particular interest here, for my Red State friends, is former - TopicsExpress

Trending Topics

Recently Viewed Topics