Ok, now, Im not one to rant but I saw an advert today that will either bring comfort or alarm to those who enjoy a gastronomic feast occasionally. See, on this particular advert for a certain eating place that indicates that it hails originally from a state in the U.S. that is famous for horse racing and was originated by a bearded retired military gentleman whos rank was higher than a major but just short of a brigadier it stated that it serves up 100% chicken. So, whats the problem? you all bellow in unison. Well, think about it. Is that 100% chicken as in no other representatives of the avian world that circles above us and craps on our freshly washed cars will be included? No stewed starling, diced duck or roasted rook? Not even a whiff of a greater crested grebe burger? Or, I shudder to think, does it mean that 100% of the chicken is used, including crest, beak, feathers and feet and other bits? I know people (whoever they are) say the only bit of a pig you cant use is the squeal, does this apply to chickens as well? The only bit one cant use is the cluck? Can we take the risk? I dont know about you but Im off down the chippy, clucking ell, what a thought my darlings. By the way, WW2 is at Blaenavon Ironworks this weekend, free entry, come in 1940s kit if you have it, see you there TTFN.
Posted on: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 20:01:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015