PERFECT ARTICLE... WARMLY RECOMMEND READING IT ALL... --------------------------------- Each time the West expected Putin to do something, he did the exact opposite: 1. Nobody expected that Putin would use military force in Crimea in a lightening-fast take-over operation which will go down in history as at least as amazing as Storm-333. 2. Everybody (including myself) expected Putin to send forces into Novorussia. He did not. 3. Nobody expected Russian counter-sanctions to hit the EU agricultural sector. 4. Everybody expected that Putin would retaliate after the latest round of sanctions. He did not. There is a pattern here and it is one basic to all martial arts: first, never signal your intentions, second use feints and third, hit when and where your opponent doesnt expect it. Conversely, there are two things which are deeply ingrained in the western political mindset which Putin never does: he never threatens and he never postures. For example, while the US is basically at war with Russia, Russia will gladly support a US resolution on ISIL if it is to Russias advantage. And Russian diplomats will speak of our American partners or our American friends while, at the same time, doing more than the rest of the planet combined to bring down the AngloZionist Empire. A quick look at Putins record. As I have written in the past, unlike some other bloggers and commentators, I am neither a psychic not a prophet and I cannot tell you what Putin thinks or what he will do tomorrow. But what I can tell you is that which Putin has already done in the past: (in no particular order) - broken the back of the AngloZionist-baked oligarchy in Russia. - achieved a truly miraculous success in Chechnia (one which nobody, prophets included, had foreseen). - literally resurrected the Russian economy. - rebuilt the Russian military, security and intelligences forces. - severely disrupted the ability of foreign NGOs to subvert Russia. - done more for the de-dollarization of the planet than anybody before. - made Russia the clear leader of both BRICS and SCO. - openly challenged the informational monopoly of the western propaganda machine (with projects like RussiaToday). - stopped an imminent US/NATO strike on Syria by sending in a Russian Navy Expeditionary Force (which gave Syria a full radar coverage of the entire region). - made it possible for Assad to prevail in the Syrian civil war. - openly rejected the Western universal civilizational model and declared his support for another, a religion and tradition based one. - openly rejected a unipolar New World Order lead by the AngloZionists and declared his support for a multi-polar world order. - supported Assange (through RussiaToday) and protected Snowden - created and promoted a new alliance model between Christianity and Islam thus undermining the clash of civilization paradigm. - booted the AngloZionists out of key locations in the Caucasus (Chechnia, Ossetia). - booted the AngloZionists out of key locations in Central Asia (Manas base in Kyrgyzstan) - gave Russia the means to defend her interest in the Arctic region, including military means. - established a full-spectrum strategic alliance with China which is at the core of both SCO and BRICS. - is currently passing laws barring foreign interests from controlling the Russian media. - gave Iran the means to develop a much needed civilian nuclear program. - is working with China to create a financial system fully separated form the current AngloZionist controlled one (including trade in Rubles or Renminbi). - re-establised Russian political and economic support for Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Brazil, Nicaragua and Argentina. - very effectively deflated the pro-US color-coded revolution in Russia. - organized the Voentorg which armed the NAF. - gave refuge to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian refugees. - sent in vitally needed humanitarian aid to Novorussia. - provided direct Russian fire support and possibly even air cover to NAF in key locations (the southern cauldron for example). - last but not least, he openly spoke of the need for Russia to sovereignize herself and to prevail over the pro-US 5th column. And that list goes on and on. All I am trying to illustrate is that there is a very good reason for the AngloZionists hatred for Putin: his long record of very effectively fighting them. What is at stake here is a planetary confrontation. The future of the planet depends on the capability of the BRICS/SCO countries to replace the AngloZionist Empire with a very different, multi-polar, international order. Russia is crucial and indispensable in this effort (any such effort without Russia is doomed to fail), and the future of Russia is now decided by what Russia will do in the Ukraine. As for the future of the Ukraine, it largely depends on what will happen to Novorussia, but not exclusively. In a paradoxical way, Novorussia is more important to Russia than to the Ukraine. Ask yourself the following question: if you were Putin and your goal was regime change in Kiev, would you prefer Novorussia to be part of the Ukraine or not? I would submit that having Novorussia inside is much better for the following reasons: - it makes it part, even on a macro-level, of the Ukrainian processes, like national elections or national media. - it begs the comparison with the conditions in the rest of the Ukraine. - it makes it far easier to influence commerce, business, transportation, etc. - it creates an alternative (Nazi-free) political center to Kiev. - it makes it easier for Russian interests (of all kind) to penetrate into the Ukraine. - it removes the possibility to put up a Cold War like wall or barrier on some geographical marker. - it removes the accusation that Russian wants to partition the Ukraine. In other words, to keep Novorussia de jure, nominally, part of the Ukraine is the best way to appear to be complying with AngloZionist demands while subverting the Nazi junta in power. A good friend of mine was a Colonel in the KGB Special Forces unit called Kaskad (which later was renamed Vympel). One day he told me how his father, himself a special operator for the GRU, fought against Ukrainian insurgents from the end of WWII in 1945 up to 1958: that is thirteen years! It took Stalin and Krushchev 13 years to finally crush the Ukrainian nationalist insurgents. Does anybody in his/her right mind sincerely believe that modern Russia should repeat that policies and spend years hunting down Ukrainian insurgents again? By the way, if the Ukrainian nationalists could fight the Soviet rule under Stalin and Krushchev for a full 13 years after the end of the war - how is it that there is no visible anti-Nazi resistance in Zaporozhie, Dnepropetrivsk or Kharkov? Yes, Luganks and Donetsk did rise up and take arms, very successfully - but the rest of the Ukraine? If you were Putin, would you be confident that Russian forces liberating these cities would receive the same welcome that they did in Crimea? And yet, the hurray-patriots keep pushing for more Russian intervention and further Novorussian military operations against Ukie forces. Is it not about time we begin asking who would benefit from such policies? It has been an old trick of the US CIA to use the social media and the blogosphere to push for nationalist extremism in Russia. A well know and respected Russian patriot and journalist - Maksim Shevchenko - had a group of people organized to track down the IP numbers of some of the most influential radical nationalist organizations, website, blogs and individual posters on the Russian Internet. Turns out that most were based in the USA, Canada and Israel. Surprise, surprise. Or, maybe, no surprise at all?
Posted on: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:36:24 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015