PUBLIC NOTICE: SO MUCH FOR a GOOD day! Malvarosa, I almost overlooked your connection to a pending criminal action brought by your department, naming me as defendant, relative a second assault and batteey inflicted upon others by complaining witness, Christopher Viscarello! Move to so disqualify: I will be at your station, inspecting all records attached to my name. If your own report or that of your co attendant, does not signify a specific finding relative any party other than me, expressly, you will have jeopardized that action, now pending since date of your response to 19 Lawrence Road on October 10th, 2013. I believe you will otherwise be found to have been ineffective, separately from your blatant and most egREgious misconduct. I believe your 911 Keeper of the Records, or designee of similar station, can be relied upon to affirm the call you responded to was placed at my behest - with a particular eye to the recorded call, wherin I was, clearly and upon a fixed record, mocked by a member of your force, as I panted my labored breathing. And that sAId member will have just so loaned her aid in the establishment of a pattern: is RPD merely coincidentally ineffective only upon each and every historical date wherepon I have attempted to solicit there service and/or protection. I believe, in bringing forward a nEw complaint, you will not so equally iNeffective in the cultivation against your department of my precipitous DEMAND, as required to serve against any government body, within a specifically proscribed time, prior issuance of NOTICE TO CLAIM - see city solicitor . . CHECK Temper Tempest: youtu.be/OS0zFTJEs6Q But church this morning was wonderful . . . thanks for asking . . . Shouldo went with mea culpa . . . TOLja to sack your advisors, din I, though? ? Hm? ? Hmm?
Posted on: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:34:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015