“President Kenyatta’s case is equally puzzling and more mortifying for the prosecutor. We have a prosecutor who, time and again, has told the court that mistakes were made in the case and no evidence exists to start a trial. What does the court do? Instead of closing the file, the court allows the prosecutor to engage and indulge in a sickening judicial jamboree. She makes one application after another on the president’s bank accounts, properties, title deeds, M-Pesa accounts etc. To what end? Why should the court preoccupy itself with endless applications that have no bearing on a case the prosecutor admits is over! If the evidence doesn’t exist, why is the court reluctant to terminate the case?”
Posted on: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:11:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015