Produced by WJF project (GloriousJapanForever) youtube/watch?v=P1lGgmYoVRc 日本人の皆さんには、ぜひ大和魂のこもった気高く誇り高いコメントをお願いします。 Indecent comments are to be removed on my sight by kaiunmanzoku Several parts of this video clips were quoted from the video works by user/SimpleTouchGroup for purpose of criticism. Section 30(1) of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (apparently in transposition of Article 5(3)(d) of the EU Copyright Directive on quotations) allows fair dealing with a copyright work for the purpose of criticism or review, provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. (from wikipedia on Quotation) 韓国人の皆さんはこれを見てください。 한국인의 여러분은 이것을 보아 주십시오. yeoksa.blog.fc2/blog-entry-504.html Korea has no legal ground. The inlets had never been under Koreas rule before Japan occupied Korea. The islands which were returned after the ww2 along with the independence of Korea were Jeju-do済州島제주도、Port Hamilton巨文島거문도、Ulleung-do鬱陵島울릉도. They referred in San Francisco Peace Treaty The occupation of Takeshima by the S.Korea is an illegal occupation undertaken on absolutely no basis of international law. No measure taken by the S.Korea during its illegal occupation with regard to Takeshima has any legal justification. This illegal occupation is not acceptable in any way, given Japans position on its sovereignty over Takeshima. Japan has been consistently making strong protests against each and every measure taken by the S..Korea and demanding the withdrawal of the measure. Since the installation of the Syngman Rhee Line by the S. Korea, Japan has been repeatedly protesting against S.Koreas actions such as claims of sovereignty over Takeshima, fishing activities around Takeshima, fires against patrol vessels, and the construction of structures on the island. In order to resolve the dispute in a peaceful manner, Japan proposed, with a note verbal, to the ROK that the issue concerning the sovereignty of Takeshima be referred to the International Court of Justice in September 1954. However, the ROK rejected this proposal. In addition, on the occasion of the Foreign Ministerial talks in March 1962, Zentaro Kosaka, then Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan, made a proposal to Choi Duk-shin, then Minister of Foreign Affairs of the S. Korea, to refer the issue to the Court, but this proposal was not accepted by the S. Korea again. This situation remains the same until now. The reason why the S. Korea avoid going to ICJ is the S. Korea know they will lose the case because their assertions about Dokdo are all forged facts and lies. If not, why not! Takeshima is and was our Japanese soil, and soul 13th year of Jijeung, Woosankuk island. 3rd line, page 50 geography book of Sejong is as below. There is no dokdo(独島) in these sentences. There are three(or four) place names, 于山武陵二島(this mean two islands 于山and武陵 ), 于山国, 欝陵島 in the sentences. The subjects of all sentences are must be 于山武陵二島 (Original)于山武陵二島在県正東海中 二島相去不遠 風日清明則可望見 新羅時称于山国一云欝陵島 地方百里 (English) 于山武陵二島 is in the sea due east from here. 于山武陵二島 is not far from here. 于山武陵二島 can be seen on a clear and fine day. 于山武陵二島 was called 于山国 in Shilla Dynasty. It is said that 于山武陵二島 is 欝陵島 itself. 于山武陵二島 has 40 square kilo. This says clearly 于山国( Woosankuk island) is 欝陵島(Ulleungdo), And there is no 独島(dokdo) anywhere in the sentences. 欝陵島(Ulleungdo)=于山国( Woosankuk island)=于山武陵二島 Common Korean cannot read Chinese characters, they ill-use it. They didnt know Takeshima at the time. youtu.be/lTtFVka6NBs
Posted on: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:58:02 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015