Professor Krauss is quite an academic and speaker, but this is a good example of someone with a fundamentally illogical argument (Tzortizis) trouncing someone with an almost unassailable premise. If I were to debate on the scientific side, against the other, I think I instead would forgo science and make a religious argument, comparing religions, only mine would be the church of the flying spaghetti monster and the teapot in orbit arguments taken with a similarly expansive doctrine to quote, and then have them invalidate my religion as opposed to theirs. What then could they do? Anyway, very interesting debate.
Posted on: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 01:13:42 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015