Protest, agitation may turn violent in a given situation but cold blooded torching of vehicles with passengers in is beyond me. Why do they have to burn innocent people in whose name are these hartals? Do it, and then blame others without being able to defend. What defense? Why should others against whom it is directed, in the name of the commoners, do these to an extent to make it a success? One, two (even that is not pardonable) is enough to malign, if the opponents of hartals want that, why would they do it so widely contributing to success. In addition, why hartals need be enforced by violence? Does not that speak a volume? Some argues, since, they only understand the language of violence therefore the violence, but who die who suffer? The very people in whose name it is done!
Posted on: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015