Question for fitness folks-- A: Non photoshopped image- but well lit, with great overall photographic pizazz. B: Lightly photoshopped image- stretch marks, zits, laugh lines removed- but no liquifying or contouring done-- C: Industry standard photoshop (no arguments please on whats standard/not standard-- this is my opinion)-- all of the above plus liquifying, contouring, enhancements- etc etc (magazine cover perfect) Which is preferred? Keeping in mind that the cost doesnt change at all- same price for each option. Ill go first-- I prefer B... I like bringing out the best from whats already there-- without turning them into someone theyre not. But appearances ARE marketable... so looking perfect does have its value (i.e. magazine covers) .02 anyone?
Posted on: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:52:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015