Rand Paul. SOZT Rand Paul has taken a stance against the Global Warming premise zetatalk/newsletr/issue367.htm that human emission are causing climate change for years, well before Obama’s decision in June, 2012 to admit the presence and pending passage of Nibiru. Rand Paul is a Republican, which presses for fewer taxes for the rich and for easing any legislation oppressive to corporations. He also represents a coal producing state - Kentucky. The Global Warming premise that carbon emissions are creating rising seas and record breaking storms have incited laws and regulations requiring corporations to pay fines and fees, to reduce their carbon footprint. But, as we have stated, this will never be officially admitted zetatalk/ning/25ju2011.htm for several reasons. Where admitting the existence of Nibiru was deemed a National Security issue in the past, thus Reagan’s Executive Order requiring a denial by observatories and astronomers and NASA, what the Global Warming crowd did was beyond denial. If NASA invented a blame-the-Sun scenario, this at most was just an alternative perpetrator – blaming the Sun zetatalk/newsletr/issue127.htm rather than Planet X. But the Global Warming explanation resulted in regulations and laws, and thus lawsuits demanding compensation to corporations can be expected. Al Gore, as a private individual, and the UN and British scientists participated. Assassinations zetatalk/newsletr/issue344.htm in the UK have resulted, as the guilty anticipate this pointed rage. What is the likely outcome? After the announcement those scientists who have contested the basis zetatalk/newsletr/issue015.htm for the Global Warming theory from the start will announce that they have been vindicated. The loudest howls will come from corporations who have been required to reduce their carbon footprint or pay fines. Since government entities cannot ordinarily be sued unless neglect or malfeasance can be proven, these lawsuits will be turned toward the fraudsters instead. The UN and Al Gore can claim they were misled by the British scientists, who have already been shown to have manipulated the data. zetatalk/newsletr/issue162.htm Regulations requiring corporate fees and fines will likely be reversed. But since the actual effect of carbon emissions cannot be established, the debate will not be allowed to end. EOZT
Posted on: Tue, 13 May 2014 23:54:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015