Re: Van de Kamp’s Bar v. Bonas America’s “Standing” – Jeopardy Mr. John Van de Kamp, I write about the Bonas article you recently published to the world on your website – the State Bars. I have may direct “libel/slander” issues with this State publishing of yours. This clarifies material points about your price economic lit posture. First, in ‘03 the feds published this about the reputations involved in this triple re-play of the exact same cherry plucked and published hearsay/gossip pumped as fact: “A cadre of brand name … firms” accused Bonas.” Second, your county-state signed a written report marking the following details: Mr. Andrew Hale/Rock Fusco in Chicago, Illinois, contacted Bonas in mid 2000 purporting to seek his assistance on a Chicago Milk price fixing class action filed in the summer of 2000. Rock Fusco did not seek the seasoned Egg case/price economic attorneys Howarth & Smith, Garrett Kendrick or Robert Skirnick’s. They contacted Bonas, the youngest of them all. Thinkers might find this odd. The caption of this Chicago Milk case was almost identical to Bonas’ Eggs case: “ … Campbell v. Milk Chains” - Chicago “McCampbell … v Egg Chains” - San Diego This striking similarity in case captions might too strike a thinking person as curious. Third, Illinois is where a company called Information Resources, Inc. is headquartered, which company Bonas had been personally investigating since 1996. It buys consumers club card scan data from chains; no chain discloses this fact. This is a first note to address many layers of libel contained in your Bonas article. Kind regards, Mom(s), you know, America! United States v. Cash Joseph Bonas, 344 F.3d 945, 951 (9th Cir.2003). 03-09-04 San Diego DA Carol Buck’s Chris Blair P.O. Report, bates stamp number 0016.
Posted on: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:56:37 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015